Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37211604›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

Noninvasive prediction of node-positive breast cancer response to presurgical neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy based on machine learning of axillary lymph node ultrasound.

Hao Zhang, Wen Cao, Lianjuan Liu, Zifan Meng, Ningning Sun, Yuanyuan Meng, Jie Fei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hao ZhangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Wen CaoDepartment of Medical Record Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Pingdu District, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Lianjuan LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Zifan MengDepartment of Blood Transfusion, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Ningning SunDepartment of Breast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yuanyuan MengDepartment of Cardiac Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Jie FeiDepartment of Breast Imaging, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China. fj2008sj@163.com.
Qingdao University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore an optimal model to predict the response of patients with axillary lymph node (ALN) positive breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with machine learning using clinical and ultrasound-based radiomic features.

methodsIn this study, 1014 patients with ALN-positive breast cancer confirmed by histological examination and received preoperative NAC in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (QUH) and Qingdao Municipal Hospital (QMH) were included. Finally, 444 participants from QUH were divided into the training cohort (n = 310) and validation cohort (n = 134) based on the date of ultrasound examination. 81 participants from QMH were used to evaluate the external generalizability of our prediction models. A total of 1032 radiomic features of each ALN ultrasound image were extracted and used to establish the prediction models. The clinical model, radiomics model, and radiomics nomogram with clinical factors (RNWCF) were built. The performance of the models was assessed with respect to discrimination and clinical usefulness.

resultsAlthough the radiomics model did not show better predictive efficacy than the clinical model, the RNWCF showed favorable predictive efficacy in the training cohort (AUC, 0.855; 95% CI 0.817-0.893), the validation cohort (AUC, 0.882; 95% CI 0.834-0.928), and the external test cohort (AUC, 0.858; 95% CI 0.782-0.921) compared with the clinical factor model and radiomics model.

conclusionsThe RNWCF, a noninvasive, preoperative prediction tool that incorporates a combination of clinical and radiomics features, showed favorable predictive efficacy for the response of node-positive breast cancer to NAC. Therefore, the RNWCF could serve as a potential noninvasive approach to assist personalized treatment strategies, guide ALN management, avoiding unnecessary ALND.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMachine LearningNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesLymph nodesNeoadjuvant therapyRadiomicsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37211604
PMCPMC10201761
OpenAlexW4377197074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.