Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37211573›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2023

Is mechanical power an under-recognised entity within the preterm lung?

David G Tingay, Hannah Naidu, Hamish D Tingay, Prue M Pereira-Fantini, Martin C J Kneyber, Tobias Becher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

David G TingayNeonatal Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-4691
Hannah Naidu *Neonatal Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Hamish D Tingay *Neonatal Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Prue M Pereira-FantiniNeonatal Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Martin C J KneyberDivision of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tobias BecherDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. Tobias.becher@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-7629
Murdoch Children's Research Institute · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1009287National Health and Medical Research Council 1053889National Health and Medical Research Council 2008212State Government of Victoria Operational Infrastructure Support Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical power is a major contributor to lung injury and mortality in adults receiving mechanical ventilation. Recent advances in our understanding of mechanical power have allowed the different mechanical components to be isolated. The preterm lung shares many of the same similarities that would indicate mechanical power may be relevant in this group. To date, the role of mechanical power in neonatal lung injury is unknown. We hypothesise that mechanical power maybe useful in expanding our understanding of preterm lung disease. Specifically, that mechanical power measures may account for gaps in knowledge in how lung injury is initiated. HYPOTHESIS-GENERATING DATA SET: To provide a justification for our hypothesis, data in a repository at the Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne (Australia) were re-analysed. 16 preterm lambs 124-127d gestation (term 145d) who received 90 min of standardised positive pressure ventilation from birth via a cuffed endotracheal tube were chosen as each was exposed to three distinct and clinically relevant respiratory states with unique mechanics. These were (1) the respiratory transition to air-breathing from an entirely fluid-filled lung (rapid aeration and fall in resistance); (2) commencement of tidal ventilation in an acutely surfactant-deficient state (low compliance) and (3) exogenous surfactant therapy (improved aeration and compliance). Total, tidal, resistive and elastic-dynamic mechanical power were calculated from the flow, pressure and volume signals (200 Hz) for each inflation.

resultsAll components of mechanical power behaved as expected for each state. Mechanical power increased during lung aeration from birth to 5 min, before again falling immediately after surfactant therapy. Before surfactant therapy tidal power contributed 70% of total mechanical power, and 53.7% after. The contribution of resistive power was greatest at birth, demonstrating the initial high respiratory system resistance at birth.

conclusionsIn our hypothesis-generating dataset, changes in mechanical power were evident during clinically important states for the preterm lung, specifically transition to air-breathing, changes in aeration and surfactant administration. Future preclinical studies using ventilation strategies designed to highlight different types of lung injury, including volu-, baro- and ergotrauma, are needed to test our hypothesis.

Indexed as

InfantLung mechanicsMechanical powerMechanical ventilationPretermVentilator-induced lung injury

Identifiers

PMID37211573
PMCPMC10200729
OpenAlexW4377192651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.