Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37211549›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Setting priorities for an agenda within the Spanish pediatric emergency medicine research network.

Roberto Velasco, Jose A Alonso-Cadenas, Mercedes de la Torre, Abel Martínez-Mejias, Santiago Mintegi, Sandra Yañez, Borja Gomez, RISeuP-SPERG network

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Research themes and key data points for child and adolescent emergency department mental health presentations: A national Delphi study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto VelascoPediatric Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain. robertovelascozuniga@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0073-2650
Jose A Alonso-CadenasPediatric Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes de la TorrePediatric Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
Abel Martínez-MejiasPediatrics Department, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
Santiago MintegiPediatric Emergency Department, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Cruces, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
Sandra YañezPediatric Emergency Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Borja GomezPediatric Emergency Department, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Cruces, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
RISeuP-SPERG network
University of the Basque Country · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESHospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús · ESConsorci Sanitari de Terrassa · ESUniversidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research network of the Spanish Pediatric Emergency Society (RISeuP-SPERG Network) needs to establish its research agenda relevant to pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) to guide the development of future projects, as other networks have done before. The aim of our study was to identify priority areas in PEM for a collaborative network of pediatric emergency research in Spain. A multicenter study was developed including pediatric emergency physicians from 54 Spanish emergency departments, endorsed by the RISeuP-SPERG Network. Initially, a group of seven PEM experts was selected among the members of the RISeuP-SPERG. In the first phase, these experts elaborated a list of research topics. Then, using a Delphi method, we sent a questionnaire with that list to all RISeuP-SPERG members, to rank each item using a 7-point Likert scale. Finally, the seven PEM experts, using a modified Hanlon Process of Prioritization, weighted prevalence (A), seriousness of the condition (B), and feasibility of conducting research projects (C) on that condition to prioritize the selected items. Once the list of topics was chosen, the seven experts selected a list of research questions for each of the selected items. The Delphi questionnaire was answered by 74/122 (60.7%) members of RISeuP-SPERG. We established a list of 38 research priorities related to quality improvement (11), infectious diseases (8), psychiatric/social emergencies (5), sedoanalgesia (3), critical care (2), respiratory emergencies (2), trauma (2), neurologic emergencies (1), and miscellanea (4).   Conclusion: The RISeuP-SPERG prioritization process identified high-priority PEM topics specific to multicenter research that may help guide further collaborative research efforts within the RISeuP-SPERG network to improve PEM care in Spain. What is Known: • Some pediatric emergency medicine networks have established their priorities for research. What is New: • After a structured process, we have set the research agenda for pediatric emergency medicine in Spain. By identifying high-priority pediatric emergency medicine research topics specific to multicenter research, we may guide further collaborative research efforts within our network.

Indexed as

Pediatric Emergency MedicineChildEmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesNetworkQuality improvementResearch

Identifiers

PMID37211549
OpenAlexW4377194843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.