Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37211197›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2023

Multi-task learning with dynamic re-weighting to achieve fairness in healthcare predictive modeling.

Can Li, Sirui Ding, Na Zou, Xia Hu, Xiaoqian Jiang, Kai Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. FERI: A Multitask-based Fairness Achieving Algorithm with Applications to Fair Organ Transplantation.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Can LiSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Sirui DingDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Na ZouDepartment of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Xia HuDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.
Xiaoqian JiangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Kai ZhangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: Kai.Zhang.1@uth.tmc.edu.
Texas A&M University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USRice University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Finding Combinatorial Drug Repositioning Therapy For Alzheimer'S Disease And Related DementiasR01AG066749 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, ZHENG, WENJIN JIM · 2020 to 2024
$4.4M
Decentralized differentially-private methods for dynamic data release and analysisR01LM013712 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066749NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emphasis on fairness in predictive healthcare modeling has increased in popularity as an approach for overcoming biases in automated decision-making systems. The aim is to guarantee that sensitive characteristics like gender, race, and ethnicity do not influence prediction outputs. Numerous algorithmic strategies have been proposed to reduce bias in prediction results, mitigate prejudice toward minority groups and promote prediction fairness. The goal of these strategies is to ensure that model prediction performance does not exhibit significant disparity among sensitive groups. In this study, we propose a novel fairness-achieving scheme based on multitask learning, which fundamentally differs from conventional fairness-achieving techniques, including altering data distributions and constraint optimization through regularizing fairness metrics or tampering with prediction outcomes. By dividing predictions on different sub-populations into separate tasks, we view the fairness problem as a task-balancing problem. To ensure fairness during the model-training process, we suggest a novel dynamic re-weighting approach. Fairness is achieved by dynamically modifying the gradients of various prediction tasks during neural network back-propagation, and this novel technique applies to a wide range of fairness criteria. We conduct tests on a real-world use case to predict sepsis patients' mortality risk. Our approach satisfies that it can reduce the disparity between subgroups by 98% while only losing less than 4% of prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

LearningSepsisBenchmarkingHumansMinority GroupsNeural Networks, ComputerFairnessHealthcare predictive modelingMulti-task learning

Identifiers

PMID37211197
PMCPMC10665114
OpenAlexW4377101068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.