ReviewJournal of biomechanics2023
Ten steps to becoming a musculoskeletal simulation expert: A half-century of progress and outlook for the future.
Review in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- GaitDynamics: a generative foundation model for analyzing human walking and running.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Video-Based Biomechanical Analysis Captures Disease-Specific Movement Signatures of Different Neuromuscular Diseases.NEJM AI · 2025Article
- Utility of synthetic musculoskeletal gaits for generalizable healthcare applications.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Innovative Bionics Product Life-Cycle Management Methodology Framework with Built-In Reverse Biomimetics: From Inception to Clinical Validation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Kinematic effects of sensorimotor foot orthoses on the gait of patients with patellofemoral pain-a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Article
- ArborSim: Articulated, branching, OpenSim routing for constructing models of multi-jointed appendages with complex muscle-tendon architecture.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A framework based on subject-specific musculoskeletal models and Monte Carlo simulations to personalize muscle coordination retraining.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- NSF DARE-transforming modeling in neurorehabilitation: perspectives and opportunities from US funding agencies.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- On the prediction of tibiofemoral contact forces for healthy individuals and osteoarthritis patients during gait: a comparative study of regression methods.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Rethinking running biomechanics: a critical review of ground reaction forces, tibial bone loading, and the role of wearable sensors.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past half-century, musculoskeletal simulations have deepened our knowledge of human and animal movement. This article outlines ten steps to becoming a musculoskeletal simulation expert so you can contribute to the next half-century of technical innovation and scientific discovery. We advocate looking to the past, present, and future to harness the power of simulations that seek to understand and improve mobility. Instead of presenting a comprehensive literature review, we articulate a set of ideas intended to help researchers use simulations effectively and responsibly by understanding the work on which today's musculoskeletal simulations are built, following established modeling and simulation principles, and branching out in new directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.