ArticleGait & posture2023
Development of an assessment of bilateral locomotor efficacy for individuals post-stroke.
Article in Gait & posture, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Compositional Data Analysis to Explore Movement Behaviors in People Who Have Experienced a Stroke.Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT · 2026Article
- Hip flexor and ankle dorsiflexor strength associated with gait speed in post-stroke hemiparesis: Cross-sectional study.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA common framework is needed to assess walking impairments in older adults and individuals with stroke. This study develops an Assessment of Bilateral Locomotor Efficacy (ABLE) that is a straightforward indicator of walking function. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can we develop a clinically accessible index of walking function that summarizes gait dysfunction secondary to stroke?
methodsThe ABLE index was developed using a retrospective sample of 14 community-dwelling older adults. Data from 33 additional older adults and 105 individuals with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis were used to validate the index by factor analysis of the score components and correlation with multiple common assessments of lower extremity impairment and function.
resultsThe ABLE consists of four components summed for a maximum possible score of 12. The components include self-selected walking speed (SSWS), speed change from SSWS to fastest speed, non-paretic leg step length change from SSWS to fastest speed, and peak paretic leg ankle power. The ABLE revealed good concurrent validity with all recorded functional assessments. Factor analysis suggested that the ABLE measures two factors: one for forward progression and another for speed adaptability. SIGNIFICANCE: The ABLE offers a straightforward, objective measure of walking function in adults, including individuals with chronic stroke. The index may also prove useful as a screening tool for subclinical pathology in community-dwelling older adults, but further testing is required. We encourage utilization of this index and reproduction of findings to adapt and refine the instrument for wider use and eventual clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.