Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37210682›Full record

ArticleOncology and therapy2023

Patient Perceptions of CAR-T Therapy in the USA: Findings from In-Depth Interviews.

Todd J Bixby, Christine J Brittle, Patricia A Mangan, Edward A Stadtmauer, Lisa R Kallenbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Promoting patient-centered care in CAR-T therapy for hematologic malignancy: a qualitative meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Todd J BixbyJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Dr, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA. tbixby@its.jnj.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2031-3035
Christine J BrittleCorEvitas LLC, 300 5th Avenue, Suite 3020, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Patricia A ManganPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Edward A StadtmauerPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Lisa R KallenbachJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Dr, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized advanced blood cancer treatment. However, preparation, administration, and recovery from these therapies can be complex and burdensome to patients and their care partners. Utilization of an outpatient setting for CAR-T therapy administration could help improve convenience and quality of life.

methodsIn-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 patients in the USA with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 10 of whom had completed investigational or commercially approved CAR-T therapy and 8 of whom had discussed it with their physicians. We aimed to better understand inpatient experiences and patient expectations regarding CAR-T therapy and to ascertain patient perspectives on the possibility of outpatient care.

resultsCAR-T offers unique treatment benefits, particularly high response rates with an extended treatment-free period. All study participants completing CAR-T were very positive about their inpatient recovery experience. Most reported mild-to-moderate side effects; two experienced severe side effects. All said that they would opt to undergo CAR-T therapy again. Participants felt that the primary advantage of inpatient recovery was immediate access to care and on-going monitoring. Perceived advantages of the outpatient setting were comfort and familiarity. Because immediate access to care was seen as crucial, patients recovering in an outpatient setting would seek either a direct contact person or phone line for assistance if needed.

conclusionAs institutions become more experienced with CAR-T therapies, outpatient care may help reduce financial strain. Patient input can help institutions improve the outpatient experience and ensure safety and effectiveness of CAR-T programs.

Indexed as

Chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapyFinancial stressInpatientOutpatientPatient engagementPatient recoveryQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37210682
PMCPMC10200031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.