ArticleOncology and therapy2023
Patient Perceptions of CAR-T Therapy in the USA: Findings from In-Depth Interviews.
Article in Oncology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Promoting patient-centered care in CAR-T therapy for hematologic malignancy: a qualitative meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Advancing access to CAR T-cell therapy: insights and real-world experience from a community oncology practice.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Using journey mapping to understand the experience and need for patients with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Patient and Caregiver Experiences of CAR T Cell Therapy for Blood Cancer in the UK: A Qualitative Study.The patient · 2025Article
- Establishing a successful outpatient CAR T-Cell program with cilta-cel: real-world experience from an expert roundtable.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- The patient and caregiver experience of CAR T-cell therapy: A qualitative analysis.Journal of psychosocial oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized advanced blood cancer treatment. However, preparation, administration, and recovery from these therapies can be complex and burdensome to patients and their care partners. Utilization of an outpatient setting for CAR-T therapy administration could help improve convenience and quality of life.
methodsIn-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 patients in the USA with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 10 of whom had completed investigational or commercially approved CAR-T therapy and 8 of whom had discussed it with their physicians. We aimed to better understand inpatient experiences and patient expectations regarding CAR-T therapy and to ascertain patient perspectives on the possibility of outpatient care.
resultsCAR-T offers unique treatment benefits, particularly high response rates with an extended treatment-free period. All study participants completing CAR-T were very positive about their inpatient recovery experience. Most reported mild-to-moderate side effects; two experienced severe side effects. All said that they would opt to undergo CAR-T therapy again. Participants felt that the primary advantage of inpatient recovery was immediate access to care and on-going monitoring. Perceived advantages of the outpatient setting were comfort and familiarity. Because immediate access to care was seen as crucial, patients recovering in an outpatient setting would seek either a direct contact person or phone line for assistance if needed.
conclusionAs institutions become more experienced with CAR-T therapies, outpatient care may help reduce financial strain. Patient input can help institutions improve the outpatient experience and ensure safety and effectiveness of CAR-T programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.