Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37210644›Full record

ArticleCell journal2023

Comparative Epigenetic Analysis of Imprinting Genes Involved in Fertility, in Cryopreserved Human Sperms with Rapid Freezing versus Vitrification Methods.

Nahid Khosronezhad, Vahideh Hassanzadeh, Maryam Hezavehei, Abdol Hossein Shahverdi, Maryam Shahhoseini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nahid KhosronezhadDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Vahideh HassanzadehDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Email: vhassanzadeh@ut.ac.ir.
Maryam HezaveheiDepartment of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Abdol Hossein ShahverdiDepartment of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam ShahhoseiniDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Royan Institute · IRUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChoosing the optimal method for human sperm cryopreservation seems necessary to reduce cryoinjury. The aim of this study is to compare two cryopreservation methods including rapid-freezing and vitrification, in terms of cellular parameters, epigenetic patterns and expression of paternally imprinted genes (PAX8, PEG3 and RTL1) in human sperm which play a role in male fertility. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this experimental study, semen samples were collected from 20 normozoospermic men. After washing the sperms, cellular parameters were investigated. DNA methylation and expression of genes were investigated using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR methods, respectively.

resultsThe results showed a significant decrease in sperm motility and viability, while a significant increase was observed in DNA fragmentation index of cryopreserved groups in comparison with the fresh group. Moreover, a significant reduction in sperm total motility (TM, P<0.01) and viability (P<0.01) was determined, whereas a significant increase was observed in DNA fragmentation index (P<0.05) of the vitrification group compared to the rapid-freezing group. Our results also showed a significant decrease in expression of PAX8, PEG3 and RTL1 genes in the cryopreserved groups compared to the fresh group. However, expression of PEG3 (P<0.01) and RTL1 (P<0.05) genes were reduced in the vitrification compared to the rapid-freezing group. Moreover, a significant increase in the percentage of PAX8, PEG3 and RTL1 methylation was detected in the rapid-freezing group (P<0.01, P<0.0001 and P<0.001, respectively) and vitrification group (P<0.01, P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively) compared to the fresh group. Additionally, percentage of PEG3 and RTL1 methylation in the vitrification group was significantly increased (P<0.05 and P<0.05, respectively) compared to the rapid-freezing group.

conclusionOur findings showed that rapid-freezing is more suitable method for maintaining sperm cell quality. In addition, due to the role of these genes in fertility, changes in their expression and epigenetic modification may affect fertility.

Indexed as

EpigeneticsMale FertilityRapid-freezingVitrification

Identifiers

PMID37210644
PMCPMC10201361
OpenAlexW4377198101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.