Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37210597›Full record

ArticleJournal of agromedicine2023

Wildfire Smoke Monitoring for Agricultural Safety and Health in Rural Washington.

Claire Schollaert, Elena Austin, Edmund Seto, June Spector, Scott Waller, Edward Kasner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agromedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claire SchollaertDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5046-0414
Elena AustinDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4724-1042
Edmund SetoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-0313
June SpectorDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0761-1256
Scott WallerThingy, LLC, Bellevue, WA, USA.
Edward KasnerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1077-5286
University of Washington · USBellevue Hospital Center · US

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sheela Sathyanarayana · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Pacific Northwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center-RenewalU54OH007544 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YOST, MICHAEL G · 2011 to 2025
$23.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH007544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the performance of a low-cost smoke sampling platform relative to environmental and occupational exposure monitoring methods in a rural agricultural region in central Washington state.

methodsWe co-located the Thingy AQ sampling platform alongside cyclone-based gravimetric samplers, a nephelometer, and an environmental beta attenuation mass (E-BAM) monitor during August and September of 2020. Ambient particulate matter concentrations were collected during a smoke and non-smoke period and measurements were compared across sampling methods.

resultsWe found reasonable agreement between observations from two particle sensors within the Thingy AQ platform and the nephelometer and E-BAM measurements throughout the study period, though the measurement range of the sensors was greater during the smoke period compared to the non-smoke period. Occupational gravimetric sampling methods did not correlate with PM

conclusionData collected before and during an intense wildfire smoke episode in September 2020 indicated that the low-cost smoke sampling platform provides a strategy to increase access to real-time air quality information in rural areas where regulatory monitoring networks are sparse if sensor performance characteristics under wildfire smoke conditions are understood. Improving access to spatially resolved air quality information could help agricultural employers protect both worker and crop health as wildfire smoke exposure increases due to the impacts of climate change. Such information can also assist employers with meeting new workplace wildfire smoke health and safety rules.

Indexed as

Air PollutionWildfiresEnvironmental MonitoringHumansParticulate MatterSmokeWashingtonParticulate MatterSmokeagriculturelow-cost sensorsrural air pollutionWildfire smoke

Identifiers

PMID37210597
PMCPMC10395649
OpenAlexW4377194854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.