Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37210526›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

The lower limit of reactivity as a potential individualised cerebral perfusion pressure target in traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI high-resolution sub-study analysis.

Erta Beqiri, Frederick A Zeiler, Ari Ercole, Michal M Placek, Jeanette Tas, Joseph Donnelly, Marcel J H Aries, Peter J Hutchinson, David Menon, Nino Stocchetti and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Editorial: Advances in neurocritical care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Erta BeqiriBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. vb391@cam.ac.uk.
Frederick A ZeilerDepartment of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Ari ErcoleDivision of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Michal M PlacekBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jeanette TasSchool for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joseph DonnellyBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Marcel J H AriesSchool for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter J HutchinsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
David MenonDivision of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Nino StocchettiNeuroscience Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Marek CzosnykaBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter SmielewskiBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
CENTER-TBI HR ICU participants and investigators

Funding

Medical Research Council MR N013433-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA previous retrospective single-centre study suggested that the percentage of time spent with cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) below the individual lower limit of reactivity (LLR) is associated with mortality in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. We aim to validate this in a large multicentre cohort.

methodsRecordings from 171 TBI patients from the high-resolution cohort of the CENTER-TBI study were processed with ICM+ software. We derived LLR as a time trend of CPP at a level for which the pressure reactivity index (PRx) indicates impaired cerebrovascular reactivity with low CPP. The relationship with mortality was assessed with Mann-U test (first 7-day period), Kruskal-Wallis (daily analysis for 7 days), univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. AUCs (CI 95%) were calculated and compared using DeLong's test.

resultsAverage LLR over the first 7 days was above 60 mmHg in 48% of patients. %time with CPP < LLR could predict mortality (AUC 0.73, p =  < 0.001). This association becomes significant starting from the third day post injury. The relationship was maintained when correcting for IMPACT covariates or for high ICP.

conclusionsUsing a multicentre cohort, we confirmed that CPP below LLR was associated with mortality during the first seven days post injury.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticCerebrovascular CirculationArea Under CurveHumansIntracranial PressureLogistic ModelsRetrospective StudiesCerebral autoregulationIndividualised cerebral perfusion pressureLower limit of reactivityTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID37210526
PMCPMC10199598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.