Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37210524›Full record

Trial reportCardiovascular diabetology2023

Lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the PROTECT study.

Shinji Kishimoto, Yukihito Higashi, Takumi Imai, Kazuo Eguchi, Kazuo Fukumoto, Hirofumi Tomiyama, Koji Maemura, Atsushi Tanaka, Koichi Node, PROTECT investigators

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-term effects of ipragliflozin on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: insights from the randomized PROTECT trial.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shinji KishimotoDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine (RIRBM), Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Yukihito HigashiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine (RIRBM), Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. yhigashi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Takumi ImaiDepartment of Medical Statistics, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuo EguchiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Kazuo FukumotoDepartment of Medical Education and General Practice, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hirofumi TomiyamaDepartment of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji MaemuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Atsushi TanakaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Koichi NodeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
PROTECT investigators
Osaka Metropolitan University · JPSaga University · JPHiroshima University · JPNagasaki University · JPTokyo Medical University · JPSaitama Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe assessed the impact of 24 months of treatment with ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes as a sub-analysis of the PROTECT study.

methodsIn the PROTECT study, patients were randomized to receive either standard antihyperglycemic treatment (control group, n = 241 ) or add-on ipragliflozin treatment (ipragliflozin group, n = 241) in a 1:1 ratio. Among the 482 patients in the PROTECT study, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) was assessed in 32 patients in the control group and 26 patients in the ipragliflozin group before and after 24 months of treatment.

resultsHbA1c levels significantly decreased after 24 months of treatment compared to the baseline value in the ipragliflozin group, but not in the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the changes in HbA1c levels in the two groups (7.4 ± 0.8% vs. 7.0 ± 0.9% in the ipragliflozin group and 7.4 ± 0.7% vs. 7.3 ± 0.7% in the control group; P = 0.08). There was no significant difference between FMD values at baseline and after 24 months in both groups (5.2 ± 2.6% vs. 5.2 ± 2.6%, P = 0.98 in the ipragliflozin group; 5.4 ± 2.9% vs. 5.0 ± 3.2%, P = 0.34 in the control group). There was no significant difference in the estimated percentage change in FMD between the two groups (P = 0.77).

conclusionsOver a 24-month period, the addition of ipragliflozin to standard therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes did not change endothelial function assessed by FMD in the brachial artery.

trial registrationRegistration Number for Clinical Trial: jRCT1071220089 ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1071220089 ).

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2GlucosidesGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsThiophenesTreatment OutcomeGlucosidesGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsipragliflozinThiophenesEndothelial functionIpragliflozinSodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitorsType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID37210524
PMCPMC10199575
OpenAlexW4377157705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.