Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37210499›Full record

ArticleCellular & molecular biology letters2023

Comparison between 5 extractions methods in either plasma or serum to determine the optimal extraction and matrix combination for human metabolomics.

Maryne Lepoittevin, Quentin Blancart-Remaury, Thomas Kerforne, Luc Pellerin, Thierry Hauet, Raphael Thuillier

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular & molecular biology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Magnetic Resonance Applications to Metabolism.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maryne LepoittevinInserm Unit IRMETIST, UMR U1313, University of Poitiers, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 86073, Poitiers, France.
Quentin Blancart-RemauryIC2MP: Institut de Chimie des Milieux et Materiaux de Poitiers, Chemistry, France.
Thomas KerforneInserm Unit IRMETIST, UMR U1313, University of Poitiers, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 86073, Poitiers, France.
Luc PellerinInserm Unit IRMETIST, UMR U1313, University of Poitiers, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 86073, Poitiers, France.
Thierry HauetInserm Unit IRMETIST, UMR U1313, University of Poitiers, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 86073, Poitiers, France.
Raphael ThuillierInserm Unit IRMETIST, UMR U1313, University of Poitiers, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 86073, Poitiers, France. raphael.thuillier@univ-poitiers.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-0031
Inserm · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough metabolomics continues to expand in many domains of research, methodological issues such as sample type, extraction and analytical protocols have not been standardized, impeding proper comparison between studies and future research.

methodsIn the present study, five solvent-based and solid-phase extraction methods were investigated in both plasma and serum. All these extracts were analyzed using four liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MS) protocols, either in reversed or normal-phase and with both types of ionization. The performances of each method were compared according to putative metabolite coverage, method repeatability and also extraction parameters such as overlap, linearity and matrix effect; in both untargeted (global) and targeted approaches using fifty standard spiked analytes.

resultsOur results verified the broad specificity and outstanding accuracy of solvent precipitation, namely methanol and methanol/acetonitrile. We also reveal high orthogonality between methanol-based methods and SPE, providing the possibility of increased metabolome coverage, however we highlight that such potential benefits must be weighed against time constrains, sample consumption and the risk of low reproducibility of SPE method. Furthermore, we highlighted the careful consideration about matrix choice. Plasma showed the most suitable in this metabolomics approach combined with methanol-based methods.

conclusionsOur work proposes to facilitate rational design of protocols towards standardization of these approaches to improve the impact of metabolomics research.

Indexed as

MethanolSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationHumansMetabolomicsReproducibility of ResultsSolventsMethanolSolventsExtractionGuidelineMetabolomicMethodsSuitability

Identifiers

PMID37210499
PMCPMC10200056
OpenAlexW4377137353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.