Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37210491›Full record

ReviewBMC medical education2023

Measurement of student engagement in health professions education: a review of literature.

Salah Eldin Kassab, Mohamed Al-Eraky, Walid El-Sayed, Hossam Hamdy, Henk Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Salah Eldin KassabCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates. kassabse@gmu.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-1996
Mohamed Al-ErakyCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2015-7630
Walid El-SayedCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-516X
Hossam HamdyCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-6139
Henk SchmidtCollege of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8706-0978
Gulf Medical University · AESuez Canal University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Student engagement is a complex multidimensional construct that has attained great interest in health professions education (HPE). Definition and conceptualization of student engagement is an important step that should drive the development of the instruments for its measurement. We have recently proposed a comprehensive framework for student engagement in HPE with a definition of engagement as student investment of time and energy in academic and non-academic experiences that include learning, teaching, research, governance, and community activities. The dimensions of student engagement in this framework included the cognitive, affective, behavioral, agentic, and socio-cultural. Guided by the student engagement framework, this non-systematic review aims to identify, critically appraise, and summarize the existing methods for measuring student engagement in HPE. Extrapolating from higher education literature, we attempted to link the theoretical perspectives of student engagement with the published methods of its measurement in HPE context. In addition, we have described the different methods of measuring student engagement including self-report surveys, real time measures, direct observation, interviews/focus groups, and the use of multiple instruments. The span of engagement dimensions measured by self-report surveys ranges from one to five dimensions. However, measurement of agentic and sociocultural dimensions of engagement in HPE is still limited and further research is required. We have also reflected on the existing methods of measuring engagement of students as active partners in HPE. The review also describes the advantages, limitations, and psychometric properties of each method for measuring student engagement. We ended the review with a guiding conclusion on how to develop and select an instrument for measuring student engagement in HPE. Finally, we addressed the gaps in the literature about measuring engagement of HPE students and future research plans.

Indexed as

LearningStudents, Health OccupationsConcept FormationCurriculumHealth OccupationsHumansDentistryHealth sciencesMeasurementMedicalNursingNutritionPharmacyPhysiotherapyStudent engagementStudents as partners

Identifiers

PMID37210491
PMCPMC10199536
OpenAlexW4377138098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.