SynthesisAesthetic surgery journal2023
Streamlining the Fat: A Systematic Review of Active Closed Wash and Filtration in Autologous Fat Grafting After Breast Reconstruction.
Synthesis in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiological Findings Post Autologous Fat Grafting and Breasts Procedures: Avoiding False Positive Results.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Mapping the Research Landscape of Autologous Fat Grafting in Breast Augmentation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Recent advances in volume retention and evaluation methods of fat grafting for breast reconstruction.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- The Landscape of Research on Autologous Fat Grafting for Breast Reconstruction.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although fat grafting in breast reconstruction continues to grow in popularity, the optimal technique remains elusive and outcomes are varied. This systematic review of available controlled studies utilizing active closed wash and filtration (ACWF) systems sought to examine differences in fat processing efficiency, aesthetic outcomes, and revision rates. A literature search was performed from inception to February 2022 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) in Ovid MEDLINE (Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands), Ovid Embase (Wolters Kluwer), and Cochrane Library (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ). Two independent reviewers screened the studies for eligibility with Covidence software. Bibliographies and citing references from selected articles were screened from Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The search identified 3476 citations, with 6 studies included. Three studies demonstrated a significantly higher volume of graftable fat harvested in a significantly lower mean grafting time with ACWF than with their respective controls. With respect to adverse events, 3 studies reported significantly lower incidences of nodule or cyst formation with ACWF with respect to control. Two studies reported a significantly lower incidence of fat necrosis with ACWF vs control, with this trend upheld in 2 additional studies. Three studies reported significantly lower revision rates with ACWF with respect to control. No study reported inferiority with ACWF for any outcome of interest. These data suggest that ACWF systems yield higher fat volumes in less time than other common techniques, with decreased rates of suboptimal outcomes and revisions, thereby supporting active filtration as a safe and efficacious means of fat processing that may reduce operative times. Further large-scale, randomized trials are needed to definitively demonstrate the above trends. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.