ArticleNature communications2023
MoS
Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Exopeptidase-assisted nanopore peptide sequence identification.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Interrogating nanopores with light: optipore sensing for single molecule analyses.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Colorimetric detection of amino acids enabled by functional nanomaterials: mechanisms, performance evaluation, and translational perspectives.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- The evolution of nanopore measurements: from biological out-of-plane pores to plastic in-plane pores.Lab on a chip · 2026Review
- Threading of Single Protein Molecules Through a Solid-State Nanopore.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Detection of Ultra-Short KYCDE Peptides Using SiElectrophoresis · 2025Article
- Enhanced Discriminability of Viral Vectors in Viscous Nanopores.Small methods · 2025Article
- Investigation on fabrication of silicon nanopores using an electrochemical passivation etch-stop strategy.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- The Research Progress of Single-Molecule Sequencing and Its Significance in Nucleic Acid Metrology.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Investigating Antiprotozoal Chemotherapies with Novel Proteomic Tools-Chances and Limitations: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- In-tube micro-pyramidal silicon nanopore for inertial-kinetic sensing of single molecules.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Detection of Glutamate Decarboxylase Antibodies and Simultaneous Multi-Molecular Translocation Exploration by Glass Nanopores.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Detection and identification of single ribonucleotide monophosphates using a dual in-plane nanopore sensor made in a thermoplasticLab on a chip · 2024Article
- Real-time detection of 20 amino acids and discrimination of pathologically relevant peptides with functionalized nanopore.Nature methods · 2024Article
- Whole protein sequencing and quantification without proteolysis, terminal residue cleavage, or purification: A computational model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Narrowing Signal Distribution by Adamantane Derivatization for Amino Acid Identification Using an α-Hemolysin Nanopore.Nano letters · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sequencing of single protein molecules using nanopores is faced with a huge challenge due to the lack of resolution needed to resolve single amino acids. Here we report the direct experimental identification of single amino acids in nanopores. With atomically engineered regions of sensitivity comparable to the size of single amino acids, MoS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.