Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37209388›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2023

Weight-Related Outcomes After Revisional Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Non-response After Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Systematic Review.

Stephan Axer, Hans Lederhuber, Franziska Stiede, Eva Szabo, Ingmar Näslund

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephan AxerFaculty of Health and Medicine, Örebro University, Campus USÖ, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden. Stephan.axer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8110-3623
Hans LederhuberRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Church Lane, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.
Franziska StiedeGP Practice Dr. Fritz Weidinger & Dr. Katharina Klein, Hauptstraße 93, 82327, Tutzing, Germany.
Eva SzaboDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Örebro University, Campus USÖ, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Ingmar NäslundDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Örebro University, Campus USÖ, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SERoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weight non-response after sleeve gastrectomy is an emerging issue. This systematic review compared revisional procedures for weight-related outcomes. We searched several databases for relevant articles and included adult patients with revisional bariatric procedures after primary sleeve gastrectomy. Twelve trials with 1046 patients were included, covering five revisional procedures. There were no randomised controlled trials, and 10 studies had a critical risk of bias. Significant variations in inclusion criteria, therapy benchmarks, follow-up schemes, and outcome measurements were observed, preventing meaningful comparison of results. Evidence-based treatment strategies for weight non-response after sleeve gastrectomy cannot be deduced from the current literature. Prospective studies with well-defined indications, standardised techniques, and strict adherence to outcome measurements are needed.

Indexed as

BariatricsBariatric SurgeryGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAdultGastrectomyHumansProspective StudiesReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeConversionRevisional bariatric surgerySleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID37209388
PMCPMC10289909
OpenAlexW4377157487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.