Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37209357›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

The structure of well-being: a single underlying factor with genetic and environmental influences.

Ludvig Daae Bjørndal, Ragnhild Bang Nes, Nikolai Czajkowski, Espen Røysamb

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Multiple social factors are associated with wellbeing when accounting for shared genetic and environmental confounding.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ludvig Daae BjørndalDepartment of Psychology, PROMENTA Research Center, University of Oslo, PO Box 1094, 0317, Oslo, Norway. l.d.bjorndal@psykologi.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-8287
Ragnhild Bang NesDepartment of Psychology, PROMENTA Research Center, University of Oslo, PO Box 1094, 0317, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7828-7863
Nikolai CzajkowskiDepartment of Psychology, PROMENTA Research Center, University of Oslo, PO Box 1094, 0317, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3713-653X
Espen RøysambDepartment of Psychology, PROMENTA Research Center, University of Oslo, PO Box 1094, 0317, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5133-7170
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 288083Norges Forskningsråd 314843Norges Forskningsråd 326350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe structure of well-being has been debated for millennia. Dominant conceptualisations, such as the hedonic and eudaimonic models, emphasise different constituents of the well-being construct. Some previous studies have suggested that the underlying structure of well-being may consist of one or a few general well-being factors. We conducted three studies to advance knowledge on the structure of well-being comprising more than 21,500 individuals, including a genetically informative twin sample.

methodsIn Study 1, we used hierarchical exploratory factor analysis to identify well-being factors in a population-based sample of Norwegian adults. In Study 2, we used confirmatory factor analysis to examine the model fit of the identified factor model in an independent sample. In Study 3, we used biometric models to examine genetic and environmental influences on general well-being factors.

resultsWe identified six well-being factors which all loaded on a single higher-order factor. This higher-order factor may represent a general "happiness factor", i.e. an h-factor, akin to the p-factor in psychopathology research. The identified factor model had excellent fit in an independent sample. All well-being factors showed moderate genetic and substantial non-shared environmental influence, with heritability estimates ranging from 26% to 40%. Heritability was highest for the higher-order general happiness factor.

conclusionOur findings yield novel insights into the structure of well-being and genetic and environmental influences on general well-being factors, with implications for well-being and mental health research, including genetically informative studies.

Indexed as

PsychopathologyQuality of LifeAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalHappinessHumansMental HealthEnvironmentGeneticsHappinessh-factorWell-beingWell-being factors

Identifiers

PMID37209357
PMCPMC10199429
OpenAlexW4377157478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.