ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023
Improved accuracy of a novel fluoroscopy-based robotically assisted THA system compared to manual THA.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic-referenced automated measurement of acetabular cup orientation on postoperative CT: development and internal validation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Accuracy of iliac crest reference pin placement in total hip arthroplasty: a CT-based analysis of risk factors for cortical perforation.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative study on the performance and early clinical outcomes of senior and junior orthopaedic surgeons in traditional versus robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Technology in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Recent Advancements.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- A study on the early clinical outcomes and learning curve of ARTHROBOT-assisted total hip arthroplasty under the ERAS concept.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Cup accuracy and early-term clinical outcomes of a novel, pinless, robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system: A first-in-human pilot study.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2025Article
- Weak hammering sounds are associated with postoperative subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Robotic-assistance is associated with better joint outcomes compared to conventional techniques in surgically routine total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched large database study of 3948 patients.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Intraoperative application of three-dimensional printed guides in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty utilizing a fluoroscopy-guided system produced similar cup accuracy and precision relative to a computerized tomography-based robotic platform.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Improved perioperative narcotic usage patterns in patients undergoing robotic-assisted compared to manual total hip arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate acetabular cup position remains a persistent challenge in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Studies investigating the early outcomes of robotic-assisted THA (RA-THA) systems have shown improved cup placement compared to manual THA (mTHA) approaches, however, contemporary robotic platforms are reliant on pre-operative CT imaging. The goal of this study was to analyze the accuracy of a novel, fluoroscopy-based RA-THA system compared to an unassisted mTHA approach and determine the effect of the robotic system on operative time. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis on a consecutive series of 198 patients who received mTHA and RA-THA between March 2021 and July 2022. The primary outcome of interest was the accuracy of acetabular component placement, defined by average cup inclination and anteversion. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of acetabular cups positioned within the Lewinnek safe zone, operative time, and overall room time. The RA-THA group demonstrated significantly higher accuracy of acetabular anteversion to target compared to the manual group (18.5 vs. 21.7˚; p < 0.001), and had a significantly greater proportion of acetabular cups placed within the Lewinnek safe zone (81.6 vs. 59.0%; p < 0.001). The RA-THA cohort had longer operative times compared to mTHA group (39.0 vs. 35.3 min; p = 0.003), but no difference was seen in total operating room time (101.2 vs. 101.2 min; p = 0.982). This study demonstrates that the use of a novel, fluoroscopy-based, pin-less THA robotic platform increased the accuracy of acetabular cup placement, including a 22.6% improvement in safe zone placement, compared to mTHA approach, with no increase in overall case time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.