Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37209254›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2023

Osteoporosis management by primary care physicians in Singapore: a survey on osteoporosis guidelines utilisation and barriers to care.

Derek Shangxian Choong, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Yi Ling Eileen Koh, Choon Kit Leong, Usha Sankari, Kim Hwee Koh

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Osteoporosis and post-fracture management in the primary care setting: a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Secondary fracture prevention in primary care: a narrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Derek Shangxian ChoongSingHealth Polyclinics, 167 Jalan Bukit Merah, Connection One (Tower 5), #15-10, Singapore, 150167, Singapore. derek.choong.shangxian@singhealth.com.sg.
Ngiap Chuan TanSingHealth Polyclinics, 167 Jalan Bukit Merah, Connection One (Tower 5), #15-10, Singapore, 150167, Singapore.
Yi Ling Eileen KohSingHealth Polyclinics, 167 Jalan Bukit Merah, Connection One (Tower 5), #15-10, Singapore, 150167, Singapore.
Choon Kit LeongSingHealth Duke-NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Program, Singapore, Singapore.
Usha SankariSingHealth Polyclinics, 167 Jalan Bukit Merah, Connection One (Tower 5), #15-10, Singapore, 150167, Singapore.
Kim Hwee KohSingHealth Polyclinics, 167 Jalan Bukit Merah, Connection One (Tower 5), #15-10, Singapore, 150167, Singapore.
SingHealth Polyclinics · SGSingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study seeks to understand the knowledge/utilisation of osteoporosis guidelines among PCPs in Singapore, their confidence in and barriers to osteoporosis management. Knowledge and usage of guidelines was associated with confidence in management. Effective guideline adoption is therefore crucial. PCPs also need systemic support to overcome barriers to osteoporosis care. PURPOSE: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are at the forefront of offering osteoporosis screening and treatment. However, osteoporosis remains under-treated in primary care, despite the existence of osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines for PCPs. This study aims to determine the self-reported knowledge and utilisation of local osteoporosis guidelines and associated sociodemographic factors and to determine the confidence and barriers to osteoporosis screening and management among PCPs in Singapore.

methodsAn anonymous web-based survey was conducted. PCPs in public and private practice were invited to participate in the self-administered survey via e-mail and messaging platforms. Chi-square test was performed for bivariate analysis; multivariable logistic regression models were used for factors with p value < 0.2.

resultsThree hundred thirty-four complete survey datasets were processed for analysis. Two hundred fifty-one PCPs (75.1%) had read the osteoporosis guidelines. 70.5% self-reported good knowledge, and 74.9% use the guidelines. PCPs who self-reported good guideline knowledge (OR = 5.84; 2.96-11.49) and utilisation (OR = 4.54; 2.21-9.34) were more likely to perceive confidence in osteoporosis management. PCPs' perception that patients had other medical priorities during the consultation (79.3%) was the commonest barrier to screening. Limited anti-osteoporosis medication (54.1%) in the practice was a hindrance to management. Polyclinic-based PCPs frequently cited the lack of consultation time as a barrier; more systemic barriers were faced by PCPs in private practices.

conclusionMost PCPs know and use the local osteoporosis guidelines. Knowledge and usage of guidelines was associated with confidence in management. Strategies to address the prevalent barriers to osteoporosis screening and management faced by PCPs are needed.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisPhysicians, Primary CareAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansSingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesBarriersClinical guidelinesOsteoporosisPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID37209254
PMCPMC10198784
OpenAlexW4377139537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.