Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37209222›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2023

Primary tumor resection or systemic treatment as palliative treatment for patients with isolated synchronous colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases in a nationwide cohort study.

Anouk Rijken, Vincent C J van de Vlasakker, Geert A Simkens, Koen P Rovers, Felice N van Erning, Miriam Koopman, Cornelis Verhoef, Johannes H W de Wilt, Ignace H J T de Hingh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anouk RijkenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Vincent C J van de VlasakkerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Geert A SimkensDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Koen P RoversDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Felice N van ErningDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Miriam KoopmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Johannes H W de WiltDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ignace H J T de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. ignace.d.hingh@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited data are available to guide the decision-making process for clinicians and their patients regarding palliative treatment options for patients with isolated synchronous colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM). Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the outcome of the different palliative treatments for these patients. All patients diagnosed with isolated synchronous CRC-PM between 2009 and 2020 (Netherlands Cancer Registry) who underwent palliative treatment were included. Patients who underwent emergency surgery or curative intent treatment were excluded. Patients were categorized into upfront palliative primary tumor resection (with or without additional systemic treatment) or palliative systemic treatment only. Overall survival (OS) was compared between both groups and multivariable cox regression analysis was performed. Of 1031 included patients, 364 (35%) patients underwent primary tumor resection and 667 (65%) patients received systemic treatment only. Sixty-day mortality was 9% in the primary tumor resection group and 5% in the systemic treatment group (P = 0.007). OS was 13.8 months in the primary tumor resection group and 10.3 months in the systemic treatment group (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that primary tumor resection was associated with improved OS (HR 0.68; 95%CI 0.57-0.81; P < 0.001). Palliative primary tumor resection appeared to be associated with improved survival compared to palliative systemic treatment alone in patients with isolated synchronous CRC-PM despite a higher 60-day mortality. This finding must be interpreted with care as residual bias probably played a significant role. Nevertheless, this option may be considered in the decision-making process by clinicians and their patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansPalliative CareRegistriesRetrospective StudiesColorectal cancerPalliative primary tumor resectionPalliative systemic treatmentPeritoneal metastases

Identifiers

PMID37209222
PMCPMC10338565
OpenAlexW4377157613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.