Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37209183›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Breast cancer risk prediction combining a convolutional neural network-based mammographic evaluation with clinical factors.

Alissa Michel, Vicky Ro, Julia E McGuinness, Simukayi Mutasa, Mary Beth Terry, Parisa Tehranifar, Benjamin May, Richard Ha, Katherine D Crew

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alissa MichelDepartment of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. am5314@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0829-9804
Vicky RoDepartment of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Julia E McGuinnessDepartment of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Simukayi MutasaDepartment of Radiology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mary Beth TerryHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Parisa TehranifarHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Benjamin MayHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Richard HaHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Katherine D CrewDepartment of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment ProgramP30CA013696 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Parisa Tehranifar · 1985 to 2026
$115.3M
Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
CAPRI: Columbia Cancer Training Program for Resident-InvestigatorsR38CA231577 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CREW, KATHERINE D, SCHWARTZ, GARY K · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000040NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013696NCI NIH HHS R38 CA231577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeep learning techniques, including convolutional neural networks (CNN), have the potential to improve breast cancer risk prediction compared to traditional risk models. We assessed whether combining a CNN-based mammographic evaluation with clinical factors in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) model improved risk prediction.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study among 23,467 women, age 35-74, undergoing screening mammography (2014-2018). We extracted electronic health record (EHR) data on risk factors. We identified 121 women who subsequently developed invasive breast cancer at least 1 year after the baseline mammogram. Mammograms were analyzed with a pixel-wise mammographic evaluation using CNN architecture. We used logistic regression models with breast cancer incidence as the outcome and predictors including clinical factors only (BCSC model) or combined with CNN risk score (hybrid model). We compared model prediction performance via area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs).

resultsMean age was 55.9 years (SD, 9.5) with 9.3% non-Hispanic Black and 36% Hispanic. Our hybrid model did not significantly improve risk prediction compared to the BCSC model (AUC of 0.654 vs 0.624, respectively, p = 0.063). In subgroup analyses, the hybrid model outperformed the BCSC model among non-Hispanic Blacks (AUC 0.845 vs. 0.589; p = 0.026) and Hispanics (AUC 0.650 vs 0.595; p = 0.049).

conclusionWe aimed to develop an efficient breast cancer risk assessment method using CNN risk score and clinical factors from the EHR. With future validation in a larger cohort, our CNN model combined with clinical factors may help predict breast cancer risk in a cohort of racially/ethnically diverse women undergoing screening.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceBreast cancerConvolutional neural networkDeep learningRacial disparitiesRisk prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.