Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37209143›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2023

Impact of sex on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney and urothelial cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Takafumi Yanagisawa, Tatsushi Kawada, Fahad Quhal, Kensuke Bekku, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Pawel Rajwa, Markus von Deimling, Muhammad Majdoub, Marcin Chlosta, Benjamin Pradere and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. The influence of sex hormones on renal cell carcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 12 countries.

Takafumi YanagisawaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-0712
Tatsushi KawadaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Fahad QuhalDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Kensuke BekkuDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ekaterina LaukhtinaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Pawel RajwaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Markus von DeimlingDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Muhammad MajdoubDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Marcin ChlostaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Keiichiro MoriDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro KimuraDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Manuela SchmidingerDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATOkayama University · JPHillel Yaffe Medical Center · ILJagiellonian University · PLKing Fahad Specialist Hospital · SAMedical University of Silesia · PLSechenov University · RUUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze and summarize the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) alone or in combination therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) stratified by sex.

methodsThree databases were queried in October 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing RCC and UC patients treated with ICIs. We analyzed the association between sex and the efficacy of ICIs in RCC and UC patients across several clinical settings. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival for the metastatic setting and disease-free survival (DFS) for the adjuvant setting.

resultsOverall, 16 RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses. In the first-line treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC) and UC (mUC) patients, ICI-based combination therapies significantly improved OS compared to the current standard of care, regardless of sex. Adjuvant ICI monotherapy reduced the risk of disease recurrence in female patients with locally advanced RCC (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.93) but not in male patients, and, conversely, in male patients with muscle-invasive UC (pooled HR: 0.80, 95%CI 0.68-0.94) but not in female patients. Treatment ranking analyses in the first-line treatment of mRCC and mUC showed different results between sexes. Of note, regarding adjuvant treatment for RCC, pembrolizumab (99%) had the highest likelihood of improved DFS in males, whereas atezolizumab (84%) in females.

conclusionsOS benefit of first-line ICI-based combination therapy was seen in mRCC and mUC patients regardless of sex. Sex-based recommendations for ICI-based regimens according to the clinical setting may help guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCarcinoma, Transitional CellKidney NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKidneyMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdjuvants, ImmunologicImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAdjuvantAdvancedGenderImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMetastaticRenal cell carcinomaSexUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37209143
PMCPMC10352444
OpenAlexW4377157534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.