Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37209010›Full record

Trial reportNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2023

Motor Activated Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Potential Neuromodulation Approach for Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study.

Bashar W Badran, Xiaolong Peng, Brenna Baker-Vogel, Scott Hutchison, Patricia Finetto, Kelly Rishe, Andrew Fortune, Ellen Kitchens, Georgia H O'Leary, Abigail Short and 3 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05943431 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) in Improving Upper Extremity Motor Function in Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorQiuyou XieRan2023 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsUpper Extremity Dysfunction, StrokeArmspaired taVNS, Unpaired taVNS, Sham taVNS
NCT06294509 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Timings in a Sensorimotor Task

TypeinterventionalSponsorOlivier LambercyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled75ConditionsHealthyArmsin-house developed transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation device
NCT06616831 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Development of At-Home Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled5ConditionsStroke, Stroke, Ischemic, Stroke HemorrhagicArmsRemote Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation Paired with Task-Specific Training
NCT06623721 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Tolerance of Movement-activated Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Motor Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorOlivier LambercyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsStroke Rehabilitation, NeurorehabilitationArmsMovement-evoked transcutaneous auricular Vagus nerve stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. [Research progress on the neuromodulation targets in stroke rehabilitation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bashar W BadranDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9376-6440
Xiaolong PengDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4488-9628
Brenna Baker-VogelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Scott HutchisonDeparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Patricia FinettoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Kelly RisheDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Andrew FortuneDeparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Ellen KitchensDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Georgia H O'LearyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Abigail ShortDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neuro-X Lab, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Christian FinettoDeparment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Michelle L WoodburyDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Steve KautzDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3151-8235
Medical University of South Carolina · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
$23.5M
Techniques DevelopmentP2CHD086844 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GEORGE, MARK S · 2015 to 2024
$12.7M
COCA: Project 4. Neurocircuit Strategy to Decrease Cocaine Cue ReactivityP50DA046373 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI REICHEL, CARMELA M · 2019 to 2023
$9.9M
RR&D Research Career Scientist Award ApplicationIK6RX003075 · VA · RALPH H JOHNSON VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2020 to 2025
–
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD086844NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA046373NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040RRD VA IK6 RX003075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), when synchronized with post-stroke motor rehabilitation improves conventional motor rehabilitation training. A non-invasive VNS method known as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerves stimulation (taVNS) has emerged, which may mimic the effects of implanted VNS.

objectiveTo determine whether taVNS paired with motor rehabilitation improves post-stroke motor function, and whether synchronization with movement and amount of stimulation is critical to outcomes.

methodsWe developed a closed-loop taVNS system for motor rehabilitation called motor activated auricular vagus nerve stimulation (MAAVNS) and conducted a randomized, double-blind, pilot trial investigating the use of MAAVNS to improve upper limb function in 20 stroke survivors. Participants attended 12 rehabilitation sessions over 4-weeks, and were assigned to a group that received either MAAVNS or active unpaired taVNS concurrently with task-specific training. Motor assessments were conducted at baseline, and weekly during rehabilitation training. Stimulation pulses were counted for both groups.

resultsA total of 16 individuals completed the trial, and both MAAVNS (n = 9) and unpaired taVNS (n = 7) demonstrated improved Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity scores (Mean ± SEM, MAAVNS: 5.00 ± 1.02, unpaired taVNS: 3.14 ± 0.63). MAAVNS demonstrated greater effect size (Cohen's

conclusionThis trial suggests stimulation timing likely matters, and that pairing taVNS with movements may be superior to an unpaired approach. Additionally, MAAVNS effect size is comparable to that of the implanted VNS approach.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationHumansMovementPilot ProjectsMAAVNSmotor activated auricular vagus nerve stimulationmotor rehabilitationstroketaVNStranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulationtVNS

Identifiers

PMID37209010
PMCPMC10363288
OpenAlexW4377140674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.