Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37208961›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

The impact of the use of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring to monitor patients at high risk of respiratory depression on nursing practice.

Marie-Soleil Hardy, Clémence Dallaire, Mohamed Amine Bouchlaghem, Issam Hajji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie-Soleil HardyFaculty of Nursing Science, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1485-9361
Clémence DallaireFaculty of Nursing Science, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-5671
Mohamed Amine BouchlaghemFaculty of Nursing Science, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2626-4077
Issam HajjiFaculty of Nursing Science, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Université Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo describe the impact on nursing practice of using continuous pulse oximetry monitoring to monitor patients at high risk for respiratory depression after surgery.

designA convergent mixed method design.

methodsThirty (30) hours of non-participant structured observation and explanatory interviews were conducted with 10 nurses from the surgery care unit and intensive care unit.

resultsWe found that nursing practice to evaluate and monitor at-risk patients through continuous pulse oximetry monitoring is mainly linked to technical care. Nurses generally meet the frequency of bedside monitoring required by established protocols. During the structured non-participant observation periods, it was observed that 90% of the alarms were false (unsustained desaturations). This was confirmed by the nurses during the explanatory interviews. Noisy environments, high number of false alarms, poor communication between nurses and various operational failures might have a negative impact on nursing practice.

conclusionSeveral challenges must be overcome for this technology to achieve the desired outcomes of continuous surveillance and rapid detection of respiratory depression episodes for post-surgical patients. No Patient or Public Contribution.

Indexed as

OximetryRespiratory InsufficiencyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMonitoring, PhysiologicPhysical Examinationnurse surveillancenursing practiceoximetrypostoperative monitoringrespiratory depression

Identifiers

PMID37208961
PMCPMC10416034
OpenAlexW4377142796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.