Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37208657›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries.

Isaac Y Addo, Evelyn Acquah, Castro Ayebeng, Kwamena S Dickson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isaac Y AddoCentre for Social Research in Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Evelyn AcquahCentre for Health Policy and Implementation Research, Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Castro AyebengDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana. castro.ayebeng@stu.ucc.edu.gh.
Kwamena S DicksonDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
University of Cape Coast · GHUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GHUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D'Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women.

methodsA sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15-49) and men (15-64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women's socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance.

resultsThe overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as "not a big problem" attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as "a big problem". The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake.

conclusionsThe study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women's characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBurkina FasoCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMalePregnancyBreast cancerBreast checkBreast screenBreast screeningMalignancySocio-demographic characteristics

Identifiers

PMID37208657
PMCPMC10199546
OpenAlexW4377095756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.