Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37208589›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing technologies as an alternative to low-density SNP chips for genomic selection: a simulation study in layer chickens.

Florian Herry, Frédéric Hérault, Frédéric Lecerf, Laëtitia Lagoutte, Mathilde Doublet, David Picard-Druet, Philippe Bardou, Amandine Varenne, Thierry Burlot, Pascale Le Roy and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Florian HerryNOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, Plédran, 22960, France.
Frédéric HéraultPEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France.
Frédéric LecerfPEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France.
Laëtitia LagouttePEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France.
Mathilde DoubletPEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France.
David Picard-DruetPEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France.
Philippe BardouSIGENAE, GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, 24 chemin de Borde-Rouge - Auzeville Tolosane, Castanet Tolosan, 31326, France.
Amandine VarenneNOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, Plédran, 22960, France.
Thierry BurlotNOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, Plédran, 22960, France.
Pascale Le RoyPEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France.
Sophie AllaisPEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France. sophie.allais@agrocampus-ouest.fr.
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRL'Institut AgroPhysiologie Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FR

Funding

Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie 2016/0804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reduce the cost of genomic selection, a low-density (LD) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip can be used in combination with imputation for genotyping selection candidates instead of using a high-density (HD) SNP chip. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have been increasingly used in livestock species but remain expensive for routine use for genomic selection. An alternative and cost-efficient solution is to use restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) techniques to sequence only a fraction of the genome using restriction enzymes. From this perspective, use of RADseq techniques followed by an imputation step on HD chip as alternatives to LD chips for genomic selection was studied in a pure layer line.

resultsGenome reduction and sequencing fragments were identified on reference genome using four restriction enzymes (EcoRI, TaqI, AvaII and PstI) and a double-digest RADseq (ddRADseq) method (TaqI-PstI). The SNPs contained in these fragments were detected from the 20X sequence data of the individuals in our population. Imputation accuracy on HD chip with these genotypes was assessed as the mean correlation between true and imputed genotypes. Several production traits were evaluated using single-step GBLUP methodology. The impact of imputation errors on the ranking of the selection candidates was assessed by comparing a genomic evaluation based on ancestry using true HD or imputed HD genotyping. The relative accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) was investigated by considering the GEBVs estimated on offspring as a reference. With AvaII or PstI and ddRADseq with TaqI and PstI, more than 10 K SNPs were detected in common with the HD SNP chip, resulting in an imputation accuracy greater than 0.97. The impact of imputation errors on genomic evaluation of the breeders was reduced, with a Spearman correlation greater than 0.99. Finally, the relative accuracy of GEBVs was equivalent.

conclusionsRADseq approaches can be interesting alternatives to low-density SNP chips for genomic selection. With more than 10 K SNPs in common with the SNPs of the HD SNP chip, good imputation and genomic evaluation results can be obtained. However, with real data, heterogeneity between individuals with missing data must be considered.

Indexed as

ChickensPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsGenomeGenomicsGenotypeSequence Analysis, DNAGenomic evaluation accuracyGenomic selectionGenotyping-by-sequencingImputation accuracyLayer chickenLow-density panelNGS

Identifiers

PMID37208589
PMCPMC10199523
OpenAlexW4377094558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.