Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37208571›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

SUCCOR Nodes: May Sentinel Node Biopsy Determine the Need for Adjuvant Treatment?

Arantxa Berasaluce Gómez, Nerea Martín-Calvo, Félix Boria, Nabil Manzour, Enrique Chacón, Nicolò Bizzarri, Luis Chiva, SUCCOR Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Arantxa Berasaluce Gómez *Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Nerea Martín-Calvo *Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Félix BoriaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
Nabil ManzourDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Enrique ChacónDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Nicolò BizzarriDipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy.
Luis ChivaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra Clinic, Madrid, Spain. lchiva@unav.es.
SUCCOR Study Group
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversidad de Navarra · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SUCCOR cohort was developed to analyse the overall and disease-free survival at 5 years in women with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the use of adjuvant therapy in these women, depending on the method used to diagnose lymphatic node metastasis. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe used data from the SUCCOR cohort, which collected information from 1049 women with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical cancer who were operated on between January 2013 and December 2014 in Europe. We calculated the adjusted proportion of women who received adjuvant therapy depending on the lymph node diagnosis method and compared disease free and overall survival using Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for baseline potential confounders.

resultsThe adjusted proportion of women who received adjuvant therapy was 33.8% in the sentinel node biopsy + lymphadenectomy (SNB+LA) group and 44.7% in the LA group (p = 0.02), although the proportion of positive nodal status was similar (p = 0.30). That difference was greater in women with negative nodal status and positive Sedlis criteria (difference 31.2%, p = 0.01). Here, those who underwent a SNB+LA had an increased risk of relapse [hazard ratio (HR) 2.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-6.33, p = 0.056] and risk of death (HR 3.49, 95% CI 1.04-11.7, p = 0.042) compared with those who underwent LA.

conclusionsWomen in this study were less likely to receive adjuvant therapy if their nodal invasion was determined using SNB+LA compared with LA. These results suggest a lack of therapeutic measures available when a negative result is obtained by SNB+LA, which may have an impact on the risk of recurrence and survival.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdjuvants, Immunologic

Identifiers

PMID37208571
PMCPMC10319697
OpenAlexW4377115491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.