ArticleDiscover oncology2023
Artificial intelligence assisted detection of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in white-light endoscopic images by using a generalized system.
Article in Discover oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Predicting Invasion Depth of Superficial Esophageal Mucosal Lesions: A Cohort Study.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk Factors Associated With Tuberculosis Diagnostic Delay in the Jiangsu Province, China (2011-2021): Spatiotemporal Database Analysis Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy and high-quality data for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing upper gastrointestinal disease diagnosis: The transformative role of artificial intelligence in endoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- The application of artificial intelligence for Rapid On-Site Evaluation during flexible bronchoscopy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The Importance of Artificial Intelligence in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe use of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted white light imaging (WLI) detection systems for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) is limited by training with images from one specific endoscopy platform.
methodsIn this study, we developed an AI system with a convolutional neural network (CNN) model using WLI images from Olympus and Fujifilm endoscopy platforms. The training dataset consisted of 5892 WLI images from 1283 patients, and the validation dataset included 4529 images from 1224 patients. We assessed the diagnostic performance of the AI system and compared it with that of endoscopists. We analyzed the system's ability to identify cancerous imaging characteristics and investigated the efficacy of the AI system as an assistant in diagnosis.
resultsIn the internal validation set, the AI system's per-image analysis had a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.64%, 95.35%, 91.75%, 90.91%, and 98.33%, respectively. In patient-based analysis, these values were 90.17%, 94.34%, 88.38%, 89.50%, and 94.72%, respectively. The diagnostic results in the external validation set were also favorable. The CNN model's diagnostic performance in recognizing cancerous imaging characteristics was comparable to that of expert endoscopists and significantly higher than that of mid-level and junior endoscopists. This model was competent in localizing SESCC lesions. Manual diagnostic performances were significantly improved with the assistance by AI system, especially in terms of accuracy (75.12% vs. 84.95%, p = 0.008), specificity (63.29% vs. 76.59%, p = 0.017) and PPV (64.95% vs. 75.23%, p = 0.006).
conclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate that the developed AI system is highly effective in automatically recognizing SESCC, displaying impressive diagnostic performance, and exhibiting strong generalizability. Furthermore, when used as an assistant in the diagnosis process, the system improved manual diagnostic performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.