Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37208487›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023

Comparison of gas chromatographic techniques for the analysis of iodinated derivatives of aromatic amines.

Nerea Lorenzo-Parodi, Erich Leitner, Torsten C Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nerea Lorenzo-ParodiInstrumental Analytical Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstrasse 5, 45141, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4761-5403
Erich LeitnerInstitute of Analytical Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 9/II 8010, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-2111
Torsten C SchmidtInstrumental Analytical Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstrasse 5, 45141, Essen, Germany. torsten.schmidt@uni-due.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-4403

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some aromatic amines (AA) have been classified as carcinogens to humans. After entering the body, mainly through tobacco smoke, they can be detected in urine. Thus, their trace analysis as biomarkers in biofluids is of high relevance and can be achieved with gas chromatography (GC-MS), usually after derivatization. This study compares three gas chromatographic methods for the analysis of ten iodinated derivatives of AA: GC-MS in single-ion monitoring (SIM) mode with (1) electron ionization (GC-EI-MS) and (2) negative chemical ionization (GC-NCI-MS), and (3) GC-EI-MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using electron ionization. All methods and most analytes showed good coefficients of determination (R

Indexed as

AminesTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, GasGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansLimit of DetectionAminesAromatic aminesDerivatizationGas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS)Gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS)Negative chemical ionization (NCI)Urine

Identifiers

PMID37208487
PMCPMC10289911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.