ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023
Can ChatGPT be Trusted for Consulting? Uncovering Doctor's Perceptions Using Deep Learning Techniques.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI dialogues in cartilage repair: which guides evidence-based decisions better?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Evaluating ChatGPT's Utility in Biologic Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Google Web Search.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Examining otolaryngologists' attitudes towards large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT: a comprehensive deep learning analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- Using A Google Web Search Analysis to Assess the Utility of ChatGPT in Stem Cell Therapy.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Article
- Harnessing the Potential of ChatGPT in Breast Reconstruction: A Revolution in Patient Communication and Education.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Can ChatGPT be Trusted for Consulting? Uncovering Doctor's Perceptions Using Deep Learning Techniques.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Intensive Care Medicine: Toward a ChatGPT/GPT-4 Way?Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the introduction of ChatGPT by OpenAI in late 2022, the question of whether doctors can employ it for consultation has been a subject of debate. ChatGPT is a deep learning model trained on a vast dataset, but concerns about the reliability of its output have been a subject of debate in recent times. In this article, we have employed cutting-edge bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) sentiment analysis and topic modeling techniques to comprehend doctors' attitudes toward using ChatGPT in consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37208451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.