ArticleScientific reports2023
Deep learning application for the classification of Alzheimer's disease using
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- From pixels to precision: a narrative review of AI-driven 3D morphological analysis and digital twinning in alveolar cleft management.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- SPECT and PET imaging of Alzheimer's disease revisited: from biomarkers to artificial intelligence-based prediction.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Review
- Tau Imaging: Use and Implementation in New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Paradigms for Alzheimer's Disease.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From pixels to prognosis: radiomics and AI in Alzheimer's disease management.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Review
- Explainable Vision Transformer with Self-Supervised Learning to Predict Alzheimer's Disease Progression Using 18F-FDG PET.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Classifying mild cognitive impairment from normal cognition: fMRI complexity matches tau PET performance.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The positron emission tomography (PET) with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.