Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37208301›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic.

Aileen M Ferrick, Satish R Raj, Thomas Deneke, Pipin Kojodjojo, Nestor Lopez-Cabanillas, Haruhiko Abe, Serge Boveda, Derek S Chew, Jong-Il Choi, Nikolaos Dagres and 25 more

Abstract readDuplicate PublicationConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Comprehensive vs. standard remote monitoring of cardiac resynchronization devices in heart failure patients: results of the ECOST-CRT study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Efficiency of Exclusive Remote Monitoring in Pacemaker Follow-Up.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Same-day discharge after electrophysiological and cardiac implantable electronic device procedures: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions (ACNAP) of the ESC.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. EHRA perspective on the digital data revolution in arrhythmia management: insights from the association's annual summit.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Aileen M FerrickWhite Plains Hospital, White Plains, New York.
Satish R RajUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Thomas DenekeHeart Center Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany.
Pipin KojodjojoAsian Heart & Vascular Centre, Singapore.
Nestor Lopez-CabanillasAdventist Cardiovascular Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Haruhiko AbeUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Serge BovedaClinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Derek S ChewUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jong-Il ChoiKorea University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Nikolaos DagresHeart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Aarti S DalalVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Brynn E DechertC.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Camille G Frazier-MillsDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Olivia GilbertWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Janet K HanVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Sherri Hewit
Christine KneelandMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Starr DeEllen Mirza
Suneet MittalThe Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey.
Renato Pietro RicciCardio Arrhythmology Center, Rome, Italy.
Mary RunteUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Susan SinclairAuckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ricardo Alkmim-TeixeiraHospital Renascentista, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bert VandenberkUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Niraj VarmaCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Elizabeth Davenport
Vicki Freedenberg
Taya V Glotzer
Jin-Long Huang
Takanori Ikeda
Daniel B Kramer
David Lin
Ulises Rojel-Martínez
Markus Stühlinger
Paul D Varosy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicTelemetryHumansAlertsCardiovascular implantable electronic deviceCIEDConnectivityDevice clinicProgrammingRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37208301
PMCPMC10199172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.