Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37208143›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

What counts as patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ICU? A mixed-methods study protocol of patient and family perspectives.

Deborah J Cook, Marilyn Swinton, Karla D Krewulak, Kirsten Fiest, Joanna Dionne, Sylvie Debigare, Gordon Guyatt, Shipra Taneja, Waleed Alhazzani, Karen E A Burns and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05506150 (Patient Important Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05506150 completednot on this map

Patient Important Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ICU

TypeobservationalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled51ConditionsGastro Intestinal Bleeding, Patient Engagement, Family MembersArmsInterviews
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Risk Factors for Patient-Important Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. REVISE:BMJ open · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Deborah J CookMedicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada debcook@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4087-543X
Marilyn SwintonFamily Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Karla D KrewulakCritical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0300-4122
Kirsten FiestCritical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7299-6594
Joanna DionneMedicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-6868
Sylvie DebigarePatient and Family Partnership Committee, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Gordon GuyattMedicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Shipra TanejaFamily Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Waleed AlhazzaniMedicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Karen E A BurnsInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John C MarshallSurgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John MuscedereCritical Care Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Audrey GouskosPatient and Family Advisory Committee and Steering Committee Representative, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simon FinferCritical Care, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Adam M DeaneCritical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
John MyburghCritical Care, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Bram RochwergMedicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8293-7061
Ian BallMedicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Tina MeleSurgery and Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6617-9790
Daniel NivenCritical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Shane EnglishClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Madeleine VerhovsekMedicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Meredith VanstoneFamily Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-6259
Impact · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern University · CAQueen's University · CAThe George Institute for Global Health · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Ottawa · CAUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding is conventionally defined as bleeding accompanied by haemodynamic changes, requiring red blood cell transfusions or other invasive interventions. However, it is unclear if this clinical definition reflects patient values and preferences. This protocol describes a study to elicit views from patients and families regarding features, tests, and treatments for upper gastrointestinal bleeding that are important to them. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a sequential mixed-methods qualitative-dominant multi-centre study with an instrument-building aim. We developed orientation tools and educational materials in partnership with patients and family members, including a slide deck and executive summary. We will invite intensive care unit (ICU) survivors and family members of former ICU patients to participate. Following a virtual interactive presentation, participants will share their perspectives in an interview or focus group. Qualitative data will be analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis, wherein codes will be derived directly from the data rather than using preconceived categories. Concurrent data collection and analysis will occur. Quantitative data will include self-reported demographic characteristics. This study will synthesise the values and perspectives of patients and family members to create a new trial outcome for a randomised trial of stress ulcer prophylaxis. This study is planned for May 2022 to August 2023. The pilot work was completed in Spring 2021. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has ethics approval from McMaster University and the University of Calgary. Findings will be disseminated via manuscript and through incorporation as a secondary trial outcome on stress ulcer prophylaxis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05506150.

Indexed as

Peptic UlcerUlcerClinical Trials as TopicGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicResearch DesignAdult intensive & critical careINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID37208143
PMCPMC10201253
OpenAlexW4377139877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.