Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37208135›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing transperineal prostate biopsy to reduce infectiouscomplications.

Jim Hu, Alec Zhu, Andrew Vickers, Mohamad Ezzeddine Allaf, Behfar Ehdaie, Anthony Schaeffer, Christian Pavlovich, Ashley E Ross, David A Green, Gerald Wang and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04815876 (Randomized Trial Comparing Transperineal vs. Transrectal MRI-targeted Prostate Biopsy; Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Transperineal Prostate Biopsy to Reduce Infection Complications), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04815876 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Trial Comparing Transperineal vs. Transrectal MRI-targeted Prostate Biopsy; Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Transperineal Prostate Biopsy to Reduce Infection Complications

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled1,040ConditionsInfectionArmsTransperineal MRI-guided prostate biopsy, Transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy, Antibiotic (prophylaxis)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. TRexit is going one step further.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Jim HuDepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA jch9011@med.cornell.edu.
Alec ZhuDepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1935-483X
Andrew VickersDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mohamad Ezzeddine AllafBrady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Behfar EhdaieDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Anthony SchaefferDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christian PavlovichBrady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ashley E RossDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David A GreenDepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Gerald WangDepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Serge GinzburgEinstein Urology, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeffrey S MontgomeryDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Arvin GeorgeDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
John N GrahamDepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Benjamin T RistauDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Andres CorreaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jonathan E ShoagDepartment of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Keith J KowalczykDepartment of Urology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Tenny R ZhangDepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
E M SchaefferDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Cornell University · USNorthwestern University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity School · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Evaluation of Transperineal Biopsy under Local Anesthesia, a Novel approach to Decrease Post-Biopsy Infections and Improve Cancer DetectionR01CA241758 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ALLAF, MOHAMAD, HU, JIM · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionApproximately one million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA, and most are performed using a transrectal approach under local anaesthesia. The risk of postbiopsy infection is increasing due to increasing antibiotic resistance of rectal flora. Single-centre studies suggest that a clean, percutaneous transperineal approach to prostate biopsy may have a lower risk of infection. To date, there is no high-level evidence comparing transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy. We hypothesise that transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia has a significantly lower risk of infection, similar pain/discomfort levels and comparable detection of non-low-grade prostate cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a multicentre, prospective randomised clinical trial to compare transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for elevated prostate-specific antigen in the first biopsy, prior negative biopsy and active surveillance biopsy setting. Prostate MRI will be performed prior to biopsy, and targeted biopsy will be conducted for suspicious MRI lesions in addition to systematic biopsy (12 cores). Approximately 1700 men will be recruited and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to transperineal versus transrectal biopsy. A streamlined design to collect data and to determine trial eligibility along with the two-stage consent process will be used to facilitate subject recruitment and retention. The primary outcome is postbiopsy infection, and secondary outcomes include other adverse events (bleeding, urinary retention), pain/discomfort/anxiety and critically, detection of non-low-grade (grade group ≥2) prostate cancer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board of the Biomedical Research Alliance of New York approved the research protocol (protocol number #18-02-365, approved 20 April 2020). The results of the trial will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed medical journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04815876.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRectumAdult urologyClinical trialsProstate disease

Identifiers

PMID37208135
PMCPMC10201229
OpenAlexW4377139048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.