Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37207496›Full record

ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2023

Motor differences in autism during a human-robot imitative gesturing task.

Nicholas E Fears, Gabriela M Sherrod, Danielle Blankenship, Rita M Patterson, Linda S Hynan, Indika Wijayasinghe, Dan O Popa, Nicoleta L Bugnariu, Haylie L Miller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reduced Hand Specialization and Idiosyncratic Visuomotor Strategies in Autism During Naturalistic Object Manipulation.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas E FearsUniversity of North Texas, Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Gabriela M SherrodUniversity of North Texas, Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Danielle BlankenshipUniversity of North Texas, Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Rita M PattersonUniversity of North Texas, Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Linda S HynanUniversity of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Indika WijayasingheUniversity of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Dan O PopaUniversity of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Nicoleta L BugnariuUniversity of North Texas, Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; University of the Pacific, School of Health Sciences, USA.
Haylie L MillerUniversity of North Texas, Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: MillerHL@umich.edu.
University of Louisville · USUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center · USLouisiana State University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1KL2TR001103 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
Visuomotor integration and attention in Autism Spectrum DisorderK01MH107774 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI MILLER, HAYLIE L · 2017 to 2021
$936k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001103NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH107774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifficulty with imitative gesturing is frequently observed as a clinical feature of autism. Current practices for assessment of imitative gesturing ability-behavioral observation and parent report-do not allow precise measurement of specific components of imitative gesturing performance, instead relying on subjective judgments. Advances in technology allow researchers to objectively quantify the nature of these movement differences, and to use less socially stressful interaction partners (e.g., robots). In this study, we aimed to quantify differences in imitative gesturing between autistic and neurotypical development during human-robot interaction.

methodsThirty-five autistic (n = 19) and neurotypical (n = 16) participants imitated social gestures of an interactive robot (e.g., wave). The movements of the participants and the robot were recorded using an infrared motion-capture system with reflective markers on corresponding head and body locations. We used dynamic time warping to quantify the degree to which the participant's and robot's movement were aligned across the movement cycle and work contribution to determine how each joint angle was producing the movements.

findingsResults revealed differences between autistic and neurotypical participants in imitative accuracy and work contribution, primarily in the movements requiring unilateral extension of the arm. Autistic individuals imitated the robot less accurately and used less work at the shoulder compared to neurotypical individuals.

interpretationThese findings indicate differences in autistic participants' ability to imitate an interactive robot. These findings build on our understanding of the underlying motor control and sensorimotor integration mechanisms that support imitative gesturing in autism which may aid in identifying appropriate intervention targets.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderRoboticsGesturesHumansMovementUpper ExtremityAutismDynamic time warpingGestureImitationRobot

Identifiers

PMID37207496
PMCPMC10684312
OpenAlexW4376613550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.