Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37207297›Full record

Trial reportAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting2023

Triplet Strategies in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Worthy Option in the First-Line Setting?

Catherine C Fahey, Jeffrey W Shevach, Ronan Flippot, Laurence Albiges, Naomi B Haas, Kathryn E Beckermann

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine C FaheyDivision of Hematology Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Jeffrey W ShevachAbramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Ronan FlippotDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Laurence AlbigesDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Naomi B HaasAbramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-7968
Kathryn E BeckermannDivision of Hematology Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training Program in Genomic MedicineT32HG009495 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Katherine L. Nathanson, Bogdan Pasaniuc · 2017 to 2026
$4.2M
VOLT (Vanderbilt Oncology Training Program)T32CA217834 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Douglas B Johnson · 2018 to 2026
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA217834NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG009495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant strides have been made in the frontline treatment of patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). There are multiple standard-of-care doublet regimens consisting of either the combined dual immune checkpoint inhibitors, ipilimumab and nivolumab, or combinations of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Currently, there is an emergence of clinical trials examining triplet combinations. In COSMIC-313, a randomized phase III trial for patients with untreated advanced ccRCC, the triplet combination of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and cabozantinib was compared with a contemporary control arm of ipilimumab and nivolumab. While patients receiving the triplet regimen demonstrated improved progression-free survival, these patients also experienced greater toxicity and the overall survival data are still maturing. In this article, we discuss the role of doublet therapy as standard of care, the current data available for the promise of triplet therapy, the rationale to continue pursuing trials with triplet combinations, and factors for clinicians and patients to consider when choosing among frontline treatments. We present ongoing trials with an adaptive design that may serve as alternative methods for escalating from doublet to triplet regimens in the frontline setting and explore clinical factors and emerging predictive biomarkers (both baseline and dynamic) that may guide future trial design and frontline treatment for patients with advanced ccRCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansIpilimumabNivolumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AIpilimumabNivolumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID37207297
PMCPMC11584060
OpenAlexW4377087586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.