Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37207199›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Risk factors and characteristics influencing humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Marie Luise Hütter-Krönke, Adela Neagoie, Igor Wolfgang Blau, Verena Wais, Lam Vuong, Andrea Gantner, Johann Ahn, Olaf Penack, Jacqueline Schnell, Klaus Axel Nogai and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Marie Luise Hütter-KrönkeCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany.
Adela NeagoieDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Igor Wolfgang BlauCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany.
Verena WaisDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Lam VuongCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany.
Andrea GantnerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Johann AhnCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany.
Olaf PenackCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany.
Jacqueline SchnellDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Klaus Axel NogaiCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany.
Bettina EberspächerDepartment of Microbiology and Hygiene, Labor Berlin- Charité Vivantes GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Maral SaadatiSaadati Solutions, Ladenburg, Germany.
Axel BennerDivision of Biostatistics, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lars BullingerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany.
Hartmut DöhnerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Donald BunjesDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Elisa SalaDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
University Hospital Ulm · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEGerman Cancer Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is approved and recommended for immunocompromised patients such as patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Since infections represent a relevant cause of transplant related mortality we analyzed the advent of immunization to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a bicentric population of allogeneic transplanted patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of allo-SCT recipients in two German transplantation centers for safety and serologic response after two and three SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Patients received mRNA vaccines or vector-based vaccines. All patients were monitored for antibodies against SARS-CoV2-spike protein (anti-S-IgG) with an IgG ELISA assay or an EIA Assay after two and three doses of vaccination. Results: A total of 243 allo-SCT patients underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The median age was 59 years (range 22-81). While 85% of patients received two doses of mRNA vaccines, 10% had vector-based vaccines and 5% received a mixed vaccination. The two vaccine doses were well tolerated with only 3% patients developing a reactivation of graft versus host disease (GvHD). Overall, 72% of patients showed a humoral response after two vaccinations. In the multivariate analysis age at time of allo-SCT (p=0.0065), ongoing immunosuppressive therapy (p= 0.029) and lack of immune reconstitution (CD4-T-cell counts <200/μl, p< 0.001) were associated with no response. Sex, intensity of conditioning and the use of ATG showed no influence on seroconversion. Finally, 44 out of 69 patients that did not respond after the second dose received a booster and 57% (25/44) showed a seroconversion. Discussion: We showed in our bicentric allo-SCT patient cohort, that a humoral response could be achieve after the regular approved schedule, especially for those patients who underwent immune reconstitution and were free from immunosuppressive drugs. In over 50% of the initial non-responders after 2-dose vaccination, a seroconversion can be achieved by boostering with a third dose.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin GMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2VaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GRNA, Viralallogeneic stem cell transplantationboosterCOVID 19-vaccinationhumoral responseSARS-CoV-2 antibodiesSARS-CoV-2-vaccinationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID37207199
PMCPMC10190126
OpenAlexW4368376743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.