Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206995›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2023

Impact of maternal obesity on preterm delivery in patients with cervical cerclage.

Hoang Yen Nguyen, Bo Park, Jordan Rossi, Beverly Tse, Alicia Cryer, Ruofan Yao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hoang Yen NguyenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA (Drs Nguyen, Park, Rossi, Tse, Cryer, and Yao).
Bo ParkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA (Drs Nguyen, Park, Rossi, Tse, Cryer, and Yao).
Jordan RossiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA (Drs Nguyen, Park, Rossi, Tse, Cryer, and Yao).
Beverly TseDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA (Drs Nguyen, Park, Rossi, Tse, Cryer, and Yao).
Alicia CryerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA (Drs Nguyen, Park, Rossi, Tse, Cryer, and Yao).
Ruofan YaoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA (Drs Nguyen, Park, Rossi, Tse, Cryer, and Yao).
Loma Linda University · USCalifornia State University, Fullerton · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal obesity has risen in the United States in recent decades.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal obesity on the risk for spontaneous preterm delivery and the risk for overall preterm delivery among patients with cervical cerclage placement. STUDY

designThis was a retrospective study in which data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development linked birth file from 2007 to 2012 were used, yielding a total of 3654 patients with and 2,804,671 patients without cervical cerclage placement. Exclusion criteria included patients with missing information on body mass index, multiple gestation, anomalous pregnancies, and gestations <20 weeks or >42 weeks. Patients in each group were identified and were further categorized based on body mass index with the nonobese group defined as having a body mass index of <30 kg/m

resultsAmong patients who underwent cerclage placement, the risk for spontaneous preterm delivery was not significantly different in the obese and morbidly obese group when compared with the nonobese group (24.2% vs 20.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.43; and 24.5% vs 20.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.12; 0.78-1.62, respectively). However, among patients without cerclage placement, the obese and morbidly obese groups had a higher risk for spontaneous preterm delivery than the nonobese group (5.1% vs 4.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 1.02-1.05; and 5.9% vs 4.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 1.00-1.07, respectively). The risks for overall preterm delivery at <37 weeks' gestation were higher for the obese and morbidly obese groups than for the nonobese group among patients with cerclage (33.7% vs 28.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 1.03-1.46; and 32.1% vs 28.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 0.72-1.43, respectively). Similarly, among patients without cerclage placement, the risks for preterm delivery at <37 weeks' gestation were higher for the obese and morbidly obese groups than for the nonobese group (7.9% vs 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 1.04-1.06; and 9.3% vs 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 1.08-1.13, respectively).

conclusionAmong patients who received a cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth, obesity was not associated with an increased risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. However, it was associated with an overall increased risk for preterm delivery.

Indexed as

body mass indexcerclagecerclage failuremorbid obesityobesitypreterm delivery

Identifiers

PMID37206995
PMCPMC10189493
OpenAlexW4365816198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.