Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206918›Full record

ArticleOccupational health science2022

Workplace Supported Recovery from Substance Use Disorders: Defining the Construct, Developing a Model, and Proposing an Agenda for Future Research.

Michael R Frone, L Casey Chosewood, Jamie C Osborne, John J Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational health science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael R FroneDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4002-3947
L Casey ChosewoodOffice of the Director, Office for Total Worker Health®, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jamie C OsborneOffice of the Director, Office for Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.
John J HowardOffice of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) represent a critical public and occupational health issue. Therefore, understanding the process of SUD recovery has become an issue of growing importance among substance use and recovery professionals. Nonetheless, despite the acknowledged importance of employment for SUD recovery, little conceptual or empirical work exists on how the workplace might support or undermine SUD recovery. In this article, we address this limitation in several ways. First, to promote a better understanding of SUD recovery for occupational health researchers, we provide a brief overview of the nature of a SUD, prior definitions of SUD recovery, and general themes associated with the recovery process. Second, we develop a working definition of

Indexed as

AddictionRecoverySubstance Use DisorderWorkforceWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID37206918
PMCPMC10193449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.