Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206917›Full record

ArticleHuman factors and ergonomics in manufacturing2022

Case Studies of Robots and Automation as Health/Safety Interventions in Small Manufacturing Enterprises.

Brian D Lowe, Marie Hayden, James Albers, Steven Naber

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Robot-Related Workers' Compensation Claims in Ohio, 2001-2020.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian D Loweformerly, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45226.
Marie HaydenNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
James Albersformerly, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
Steven NaberOhio Bureau of Workers Compensation, 30 West Spring Street, 25th floor, Columbus, OH 43215.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USOhio Department of Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews the experiences of 63 case studies of small businesses (< 250 employees) with manufacturing automation equipment acquired through a health/safety intervention grant program. The review scope included equipment technologies classified as industrial robots (n = 17), computer numerical control (CNC) machining (n = 29), or other programmable automation systems (n = 17). Descriptions of workers' compensation (WC) claim injuries and identified risk factors that motivated acquisition of the equipment were extracted from grant applications. Other aspects of the employer experiences, including qualitative and quantitative assessment of effects on risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), effects on productivity, and employee acceptance of the intervention were summarized from the case study reports. Case studies associated with a combination of large reduction in risk factors, lower cost per affected employee, and reported increases in productivity were: CNC stone cutting system, CNC/vertical machining system, automated system for bottling, CNC/routing system for plastics products manufacturing, and a CNC/Cutting system for vinyl/carpet. Six case studies of industrial robots reported quantitative reductions in MSD risk factors in these diverse manufacturing industries: Snack Foods; Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, and Chemical; Machine Shops; Leather Good and Allied Products; Plastic Products; and Iron and Steel Forging. This review of health/safety intervention case studies indicates that advanced (programmable) manufacturing automation, including industrial robots, reduced workplace musculoskeletal risk factors and improved process productivity in most cases.

Indexed as

case studiesinterventionmanufacturing automationmusculoskeletal disordersrobot

Identifiers

PMID37206917
PMCPMC10191138
OpenAlexW4292603065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.