Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206910›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2023

Multimodal monitoring: practical recommendations (dos and don'ts) in challenging situations and uncertainty.

Rohan Sharma, Mariam Tsikvadze, Jeffrey Peel, Levi Howard, Nidhi Kapoor, William D Freeman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Traumatic brain injury in obstetric patients: challenges and management strategiesRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rohan SharmaDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Mariam TsikvadzeDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Jeffrey PeelDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Levi HowardDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Nidhi KapoorDepartment of Neurology, Baptist Medical Center, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
William D FreemanDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advancements in modern medicine, new methods are being developed to monitor patients in the intensive care unit. Different modalities evaluate different aspects of the patient's physiology and clinical status. The complexity of these modalities often restricts their use to the realm of clinical research, thereby limiting their use in the real world. Understanding their salient features and their limitations can aid physicians in interpreting the concomitant information provided by multiple modalities to make informed decisions that may affect clinical care and outcomes. Here, we present a review of the commonly used methods in the neurological intensive care unit with practical recommendations for their use.

Indexed as

cerebral blood flow monitoringcerebral metabolism monitoringintracranial pressure monitoringmultimodal monitoringNear Infrared Spectroscopypupillometryquantitative EEGtranscranial Doppler

Identifiers

PMID37206910
PMCPMC10188941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.