Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206904›Full record

ReviewJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2023

Biomarker-Driven Oncology Clinical Trials: Novel Designs in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Donald C Moore, Andrew S Guinigundo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. RNA therapeutic targeting of recalcitrant and rare cancers.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chloride intracellular channels in oncology as potential novel biomarkers and personalized therapy targets: a systematic review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donald C MooreFrom Department of Pharmacy, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Andrew S GuinigundoCincinnati Cancer Advisors, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Levine Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncology drug development historically has followed a path of sequential phase I, II, and III clinical trials using traditional trial designs, with the goal of achieving regulatory approval. These studies are often conducted with inclusion criteria that limit enrollment to a single tumor type or tumor site of origin, excluding other patients who might also respond. Increased use of precision medicine targeting biomarkers or specific oncogenic mutations has led to novel clinical trial designs that can evaluate these therapies in a less limited fashion. Master protocols such as basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials can, for example, evaluate histology-specific therapies targeting a common oncogenic mutation across multiple tumor types or screen for the presence of multiple different biomarkers rather than a single one. In other cases, they can lead to more rapid evaluation of a drug and evaluate targeted therapies in tumor types for which they are not yet currently indicated. As the use of complex biomarker-based master protocols increases, advanced practitioners must understand these novel trial designs, their advantages and disadvantages, and how their use may advance drug development and maximize the clinical benefits of molecular precision therapy.

Identifiers

PMID37206904
PMCPMC10190802
OpenAlexW4376620982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.