Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206812›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2023

Snot-22 a Predictive and Assessment Tool for Subjective Improvement After Fess in Patients of Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Anshul Sharma, Neha Raghuwanshi, Yamini Gupta, Aparaajita Upadhyay, Rajkumar Mundra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anshul SharmaDepartment of E.N.T., M.G.M. Medical College, 104 President Regency, 3/5 Manoramaganj, Indore, 452001 India.
Neha RaghuwanshiDepartment of E.N.T., M.G.M. Medical College, 104 President Regency, 3/5 Manoramaganj, Indore, 452001 India.
Yamini GuptaDepartment of E.N.T., M.G.M. Medical College, 104 President Regency, 3/5 Manoramaganj, Indore, 452001 India.
Aparaajita UpadhyayDepartment of E.N.T., M.G.M. Medical College, 104 President Regency, 3/5 Manoramaganj, Indore, 452001 India.ORCID 0000-0002-7232-2784
Rajkumar MundraDepartment of E.N.T., M.G.M. Medical College, 104 President Regency, 3/5 Manoramaganj, Indore, 452001 India.
Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common health problem with an estimated prevalence of 6.8% in Asia. The treatment of CRS involves an initial course of maximal medical therapy followed by Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS). Here, we are assessing the outcomes of FESS on CRS using most recent Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) questionnaire, for quantifying changes in symptoms and predicting extent of postoperative improvement. 75 patients who reported in the tertiary health care centre in Department of ENT, MGM Medical College & M.Y. Hospital, Indore and were diagnosed with CRS that did not relieve on medication were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected cases were asked to answer the SNOT-22 questionnaire before the surgery. FESS was done and after three months, the patients were again subjected to the SNOT-22 questionnaire. There was 83.67% overall improvement in postsurgical SNOT-22 evaluations, which was statistically significant (

Indexed as

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS)Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22

Identifiers

PMID37206812
PMCPMC10188815
OpenAlexW4322762426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.