ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2023
Contemporary Plural Deliberations and Perspectives in Revision Middle Ear Surgery. Causes, Outcomes and Lessons Learned.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The indications for revision middle ear surgery are inter-linked to the objectives of surgery and needs of the patient. Revision middle ear surgery is often challengingly arduous not only for the patient but for the surgeon as well. This study concentrates on the causes of failures of primary ear surgery, indications, techniques, outcomes and lessons learned in revision ear surgery. This retrospectivedescriptive study included 22 cases (12.29%) of revision surgery,with a follow up of at least one year, out of total 179 cases of middle ear surgeries performed over a period of 5 years.These revision cases included tympanoplasty, cortical mastoidectomy and modified radical mastoidectomy alongwith ossiculoplasty and scutumplasty, wherever required. Hearing improvement, closure of perforation, and prevention of recrudescence were the main outcome parameters. The overall morphologic success of revision surgery in our series was 90.90%.There was one graft failure, one attic retraction and the main complication observed was post-operative worsening of hearing.Mean postoperative pure-tone average air -bone gap (ABG) was 20.86 ± 11.29 dB compared with preoperative ABG of 29.64 ± 10.63 dB and the difference was statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.