Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206697›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2023

Automatic textual description of colorectal polyp features: explainable artificial intelligence.

Ayla Thijssen, Ramon-Michel R Schreuder, Roger Fonollà, Quirine van der Zander, Thom Scheeve, Bjorn Winkens, Sharmila Subramaniam, Pradeep Bhandari, Peter de With, Ad Masclee and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ayla ThijssenMaastricht University Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4488-4333
Ramon-Michel R SchreuderCatharina Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0400-7387
Roger FonollàEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Quirine van der ZanderMaastricht University Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8640-5521
Thom ScheeveEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8288-0368
Bjorn WinkensMaastricht University, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Sharmila SubramaniamPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3104-7616
Pradeep BhandariPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Peter de WithEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Ad MascleeMaastricht University Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Fons van der SommenEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3593-2356
Erik SchoonMaastricht University, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided diagnosis systems (CADx) can improve colorectal polyp (CRP) optical diagnosis. For integration into clinical practice, better understanding of artificial intelligence (AI) by endoscopists is needed. We aimed to develop an explainable AI CADx capable of automatically generating textual descriptions of CRPs. For training and testing of this CADx, textual descriptions of CRP size and features according to the Blue Light Imaging (BLI) Adenoma Serrated International Classification (BASIC) were used, describing CRP surface, pit pattern, and vessels. CADx was tested using BLI images of 55 CRPs. Reference descriptions with agreement by at least five out of six expert endoscopists were used as gold standard. CADx performance was analyzed by calculating agreement between the CADx generated descriptions and reference descriptions. CADx development for automatic textual description of CRP features succeeded. Gwet's AC1 values comparing the reference and generated descriptions per CRP feature were: size 0.496, surface-mucus 0.930, surface-regularity 0.926, surface-depression 0.940, pits-features 0.921, pits-type 0.957, pits-distribution 0.167, and vessels 0.778. CADx performance differed per CRP feature and was particularly high for surface descriptors while size and pits-distribution description need improvement. Explainable AI can help comprehend reasoning behind CADx diagnoses and therefore facilitate integration into clinical practice and increase trust in AI.

Identifiers

PMID37206697
PMCPMC10191733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.