ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2023
Cervical cancer screening in Jordan; a review of the past and an outlook to the future - facts and figures.
Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of a culturally tailored educational intervention on women's knowledge and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening: a single-group pre-post study.Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- An insight into the experience of healthcare providers and users of women-friendly health services in Jordan-a mixed method study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- A Bayesian Logistic Regression Approach to Investigating the Determinants Associated with Never Having Been Screened for Cervical Cancer Amongst Child-Bearing-Age Women in Jordan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Turning the tide: From cervical cancer's grip to complete response: A case report.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Factors associated with awareness of and undergoing Pap smear tests among Jordanian women.Narra J · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to assess the attitude, knowledge, and behaviour of Jordanian women toward cervical cancer screening and its phenomenal role in preventing the disease, and to identify the defects and obstacles in the national screening programs for early detection of this manageable kind of malignancy.Material and methods: A prospective study via a questionnaire that included the demographic data, knowledge, behaviour, and attitude among Jordanian women about the cervical screening program using face-to-face interviews. Results: Among 655 women who responded to the questionnaire, 340 (51.9%) reported having no idea about the smear, 350 (53.4%) had completed higher education, 84 (12.84%) were not happy to be screened, and 53 (8.09%) were afraid of the result being positive for malignancy. The shocking and scandalous upshots reported that 600 women (91.6%) had no idea about the role of vaccination against this threatening disease. Conclusions: Screening programs occupy a limited space among the health care provider's priorities. The health education and national awareness strategy regarding cervical cancer should be adopted and implemented in primary health care units. The media with its different facets and platforms must take responsibility and share this national cancer education battle. The once-in-a-lifetime screening test should be adopted urgently, being the most important step, because it represents the minimum correct starting point to lessen the future burden on the national healthcare system and benefit the health of the target groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.