ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2023
Accuracy of the risk of malignancy index-I in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in menopausal women.
Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- CA-125/albumin and lymphocyte/albumin ratios as complementary biomarkers to the malignancy risk index in ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nomogram development for predicting ovarian tumor malignancy using inflammatory biomarker and CA-125.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To detect the accuracy of the risk of malignancy index-I (RMI-I) in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in menopausal women. Material and methods: Eighty-two menopausal women with suspected ovarian masses (OMs) scheduled for surgery were included in this study. Blood samples were preoperatively collected from participants to measure the CA-125, followed by transvaginal sonography to evaluate the suspected OMs regarding the consistency, whether the OMs were unilateral or bilateral, unilocular or multilocular, and for extra-ovarian metastasis. The preoperative RMIs were compared to the postoperative histology of the excised OMs to detect the accuracy of RMI-I at a cut-off value of 200 in diagnosing ovarian malignancy. The receiver operating characteristic curve was also used to detect the cut-off value of RMI-I with the highest sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in menopausal women. Results: The incidence of benign and malignant OMs in the studied menopausal women was 59.8% and 40.2%, respectively. The risk of malignancy index-I at a cut-off value 200 in this study had 75.8% sensitivity, 91.8% specificity, 86.2% positive predictive value (PPV), and 84.9% negative predictive value (NPV) in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in menopausal women. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the RMI-I at a cut-off value of > 241.5 had 96% sensitivity and 94.74% specificity in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in menopausal women (AUC 0.98, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, Conclusions: The risk of malignancy index I at a cut-off value of 200 had 75.8% sensitivity, 91.8% specificity, 86.2% PPV, and 84.9% NPV in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in menopausal women. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the RMI-I at a cut-off value > 241.5 had 96% sensitivity and 94.74% specificity in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in menopausal women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.