ArticleCureus2023
A Single-Centre Experience of First-Line Romiplostim and Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients With Aplastic Anemia.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim in the Treatment of Aplastic Anemia: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.Current medical science · 2026Pooled it
- Romiplostim in the management of severe aplastic anemia: a comprehensive clinical review.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of romiplostim with horse anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclosporine in acquired aplastic anemia.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of romiplostim in children with acquired aplastic anemia who are naïve to immunosuppressive therapy.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Identification of molecular heterogeneity in telomere maintenance pathway of aplastic anemia.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Romiplostim, a thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor antagonist, promotes tri-lineage hematopoiesis in patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA). However, its efficacy as a first-line treatment in combination with an immunosuppressant, i.e., anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CSA), remains unexplored. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of romiplostim in combination with ATG and CSA as first-line treatment in patients with AA. Method A single-center, retrospective study of AA patients, where data of patients administered with ATG + CSA + romiplostim as a first-line treatment was included. Romiplostim 5 µg/kg weekly for one month; post that, the dose was increased to 10 µg/kg weekly for the next five months. The primary outcome involves the overall response rate and hematological response at baseline, three months, and six months. Result Data from 12 patients with a median age of 18 years was evaluated. At a median follow-up of six months, 25% achieved a complete response, 41.6% achieved a partial response, and 16.7% had no response. Improvement in tri-lineage hematopoietic response had been seen at six months from baseline, with improvement in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet count (PC) being the most significant, with an increase of >100% from baseline, followed by total leukocyte count (TLC) (75.13%) and hemoglobin (Hb) (66.07%) from baseline. Two deaths were reported during the treatment. Conclusion Romiplostim, in combination with ATG plus CSA, demonstrated clinically significant outcomes as a first-line treatment in patients with AA. Further studies are required to confirm these findings in larger populations to assess long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.