ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2023
Angiomatous meningioma with bizarre nuclei: A case report.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Angiomatous Meningioma With Postictal Hemiparesis: Clinical Presentation and Surgical Challenges in a Rare Case.Cureus · 2025Article
- Recurrent Angiomatous Meningioma in a Young Adult: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiomatous meningioma (AM) is a relatively rare subtype of WHO grade I meningioma. A relatively rare case of AM was recently encountered in a 45-year-old woman. The present case not only observed the typical AM histological pattern but also a large number of cells with bizarre, large, deeply staining and unevenly distributed nuclei. These cells with bizarre nuclei showed a similar pattern of immunoreactivity as meningeal epithelial cells. Although the presence of a large number of cells with bizarre nuclei in this case increased tumour cell atypia, the cells did not differ with regard to proliferative activity and mitotic imaging. Therefore, the patient was ultimately diagnosed as having AM with bizarre nuclei, WHO grade I. This manifestation of nuclear atypia and pleomorphism may be due to 'degenerative changes' in pre-existing, long-established vascular lesions, similar to those seen in degenerative schwannomas and symplastic haemangioma, rather than being considered an indicator of malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.