ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2023
A polymer-based systemic hemostat for managing uncontrolled bleeding.
Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Double cross-linked cellulose hydrogel-supported Fe species for efficient wound healing.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Transfusion biomaterials for hemostasis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2025Review
- Hemostatic Antimicrobial Hydrogels Based on Silicon, Iron, Zinc, and Boron Glycerolates for Wound Healing Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Iron(III) Monoglycerolate as a New Biocompatible Precursor in the Synthesis of Bioactive Nanocomposite Glycerohydrogels.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2024Article
- State of the art, trends, hotspots, and prospects of injection materials for controlling bleeding.International wound journal · 2024Review
- A polymer-based systemic hemostat for managing uncontrolled bleeding.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uncontrolled bleeding is a life-threatening emergency that requires immediate intervention. Currently available on-site bleeding interventions largely rely on the use of tourniquets, pressure dressing, and other topical hemostatic agents, which can only treat bleeding injuries that are known, accessible, and potentially compressible. Synthetic hemostats that are stable at room temperature, easy to carry, field-usable, and able to stop internal bleeding at multiple or unknown sources, are still lacking. We recently developed a hemostatic agent via polymer peptide interfusion (HAPPI), which can selectively bind to activated platelets and injury sites after intravascular administration. Here we report that HAPPI is highly effective in treating multiple lethal traumatic bleeding conditions in normal as well as hemophilia models via either systemic administration or topical application. In a rat liver traumatic model, intravenous injection of HAPPI resulted in a significant decrease in blood loss and a four-fold reduction in mortality rate within 2 h after injury. When applied topically on liver punch biopsy wounds in heparinized rats, HAPPI achieved a 73% of reduction in blood loss and a five-fold increase in survival rate. HAPPI also exhibited hemostatic efficacy in hemophilia A mice by reducing blood loss. Further, HAPPI worked synergistically with rFVIIa to induce immediate hemostasis and 95% reduction in total blood loss compared to the saline-treated group in hemophelia mice models. These results demonstrate that HAPPI is a promising field-usable hemostatic agent for a broad range of different hemorrhagic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.